The Myth of Female Intelligence

stupid

I am smarter than nearly all the girls I’ve ever known.

That’s not arrogance talking: it’s the truth. Out of all the girls I’ve known, maybe three were at least as smart as me, and of that three, one is more intelligent than me. All the rest were my intellectual inferiors. I don’t hold it against them; in fact, when I run across girls who tout their “intelligence,” I feel nauseous, like I’m dealing with a pack of overeager Mormon missionaries.

One of the most dangerous delusions of modern America is the idea that girls are desirable because of how smart they are. Indeed, the idea that intelligent girls even exist in significant numbers is ridiculous. Puffed up by you-go-grrl propaganda from the media, their heads filled with lies from the universities, every girl who can spell her own name suddenly thinks she’s Einstein. Worst of all, girls think that being able to spell their own names entitles them to a good man, even when they’re bossy, defiant and lacking in feminine graces.

This is laughable.

The reality is that truly intelligent females are rare, and most girls who consider themselves “smart” are not. More importantly, the idea that men should find female intelligence attractive is as preposterous as expecting them to find hermaphroditism sexy. A girl’s most important aspects will always be her beauty, her charm and her willingness to please, with intelligence so far down the list that it might as well not be on the list.

Yet thanks to white knights artificially pumping up the egos of every girl in America, men are made to feel like freaks for considering a girl’s bust size to be more important than her ability to regurgitate Marxist tripe.

Here are my reasons why female intelligence is a fraud.

1. Few girls are actually intelligent.

This is the most important thing to know: intelligence is largely a masculine attribute. IQ testing has consistently shown that while men and females have the same mean intelligence, men have a wider standard deviation while females cluster around the middle. In layman’s terms, this means that there are more intelligent men than there are intelligent girls. At the same time, it also means that there are more unintelligent men then unintelligent girls, which is why the short bus tends to be a sausage fest. The “dumb bimbo” stereotype is a fiction invented by ugly girls.

Turns out that “boys go to Jupiter to get more stupider, girls go to college to get more knowledge” was at least half true.

This is why it’s a waste of time for smart men to cast about for a girl who is their intellectual equal: she simply doesn’t exist. You have a better chance of talking Zooey Deschanel and Ellen Page into a threesome than finding a girl who can match you in knowledge, life experience and all-around brains. You do find the occasional woman who can hold her own with men, but these exceptions don’t disprove the rule, any more than the existence of Kim Peek disproves the fact that most autistics are hand-flapping retards.

What’s really awful about this situation is that the mainstream media, invested in hiding the truth, blame men for not being able to find the right girl. “You’re looking in the wrong places.” “Intelligent, classy girls don’t hang out at bars.” “Maybe you just attract the wrong kinds of people.” They can’t simply admit that females are the passive sex, built for raising babies and not much else, because doing so might hurt girls’ self-esteem… and we can’t very well have that, now can we?

2. Girls are intellectually inferior.

Several months ago, I was on Twitter killing time when some teenage girl started sending rude and insulting Tweets at me because she was offfeeennnded at my article on why most girls shouldn’t bother going to college. I initially ignored her, but when she continued to harass me, touting her “4.0 GPA” and how smart she was, I clicked through to her profile and did a little research. Turns out that this oh-so-intelligent young lady was spending $58,000 a year to major in acting. Furthermore, while she was not unattractive—she had a good bone structure, a cute face and huge… tracts of land—she was at least twenty pounds overweight, so several of my followers started calling her fat. What was her response?

She started sending pictures of herself to me in an attempt to prove she wasn’t fat.

This girl wasn’t stupid; she was clearly four or five points above the mean female IQ. But not only did she massively overrate her intelligence, she was unwilling to accept that maybe, just maybe, she had made some poor choices in life.

That is the modern “intelligent” girl; an intellectual vacuum. Her life one great big fraud from beginning to end. Despite her vaunted “smarts” and her belief that she can “do anything,” she doesn’t major in math, engineering, computer programming or any discipline that requires actual work. No, she picks a soft major like English, education or ethnic studies, where there are no standards and you can pass any nonsense in for a grade so long as you sound authoritative. She rationalizes her choices by saying that she wants to “help the children” or she’s “interested in learning,” despite the fact that all American education does is teach people to memorize Marxist nonsense and repeat it back word for word.

Claiming that girls are intelligent because they earn the majority of degrees is like saying that parrots are intelligent because the majority of them can mimic human speech.

When she graduates, assuming she isn’t spat right back into the service industry, she’ll go to work as a government bureaucrat, HR commissar, paralegal or other profession that contributes nothing to society. She’ll complain about the pay gap even as she takes every day off she can because her “head hurts” or she “needs some time off with the girls.” She’ll whine about the lack of girls in management roles even as she plans to quit her job when she has kids… but not until she’s in her thirties, of course.

After all, she wants to “have fun” first and “get it out of [her] system” before she settles down.

But it’s in her choice of hobbies that the modern “smart” girl truly exposes her vacuity. She doesn’t spend her free time reading science textbooks or perfecting her chess game: she TiVoes Teen Mom and obsesses over Lena Dunham’s cleavage. If she reads books at all, she limits herself to trashy mainstream thrillers like The Hunger Games or textual pornography like Twilight. Her weekends are spent pumping chumps for peach daiquiris at the dive bar and getting pumped by every stud who stirs her loins. Even so-called “nerd girls” are phonies, as their “nerdiness” extends to playing video games once in a blue moon or re-Tweeting charlatans like Neil deGrasse Tyson.

The only thing separating her from a ghetto baby momma is the ability to form complete sentences.

Face it: the vast majority of girls are as hollow as a drum. The three or four surplus IQ points that college-educated girls have are wasted on them, because all they’re used for is rationalizing a life of mindless consumption and sluttiness. If the modern West is a cesspool, girls are its most devoted coprophages, gulping down runny diarrhea by the bucketload with forced smiles on their faces.

3. Girls know that their “intelligence” is a lie.

As loudly as they brag about their “strength” and “independence,” girls know inside that their credentials are worthless in the eyes of men. Go back to that chubby acting major who started insulting me on Twitter. Me pointing out that her degree was worthless didn’t faze her, nor did my reminding her that she was wasting sixty grand a year for it. It was calling her fat—insulting her looks—that wounded her most deeply.

And she was so insecure that she resorted to begging for validation from me, a man she considered a “misogynist.”

The vagina is the perfect representation of the nature of females. An empty vessel, a hole, a void with no identity of its own. Without a man to fill her with his essence, she is as useless as a crabapple rotting on the sidewalk. Only by taking that essence deep inside her can she mature and become the woman she was meant to be. And filled with the wrong essence, she becomes an intellectual Typhoid Mary, mindlessly infecting others with her diseases of the mind.

That’s the problem with girls today: they’re so full of bullshit that their eyeballs are brown.

That bullshit is pumped into their skulls by men. Every advance in “women’s rights” occurs only because men allow it to occur. Women’s suffrage was only passed into law in the U.S. because leftist Protestants in the Republican Party wanted to ensure an electoral majority for Prohibition and other “social purity” policies. Sexual liberation only happened in the sixties because cowardly draft-dodging hippies, knowing they could not compete with real men for the affections of feminine women, encouraged girls to slut it up so they could get laid. The mass entry of girls into college and the workforce was instigated by corporate capitalists in order to drive down wages and smash workers’ rights.

If at any point, men had collectively told girls no, they would have quieted down and gone back to the kitchen like they were told.

So it is with the myth of female intelligence. Girls believe they are smart, worldly and cultured because men lie and white knight for them. The gelded father telling his little princess that she can be whatever she wants to be, the slack-wristed orbiter who writes sweet nothings on her Facebook posts, the hipster nancyboy who claims he wants an “equal”: they are the enemy. Without them, the Katerinas of America would gladly kneel to their Petruchios. Because these genetic discards cannot compete with legitimate men, they encourage degeneracy in the vain hope of getting their dicks wet.

Spraying the hollyhocks with lye is the only way they can propagate their diseased seed.

As men, it is our responsibility to bring girls back to their proper place. To lead them into their natural roles as wives and mothers. We men do not choose or reward girls for their clown college degrees, their meaningless cubicle jobs, or their supposed “intelligence.” We reward them for their willingness to please us and make us happy, and in doing so make themselves happy. No amount of phony education or career “success” will scratch that deep itch in a girl’s soul: the desire to serve a man.

Not a “guy,” not a “male”: a man.

Inside every Strong, Independent Woman™ is a suppliant girl yearning to break free. I say we give that girl a hand.

Read Next: The Case Against Female Education

Opt In Image
Get My Free E-Book

Learn how to start a blog and make money from day one with this short guide. Also receive twice-monthly updates highlighting my best articles as well as news and special offers you won't find anywhere else.

I guarantee 100% privacy. Your information will not be shared.

  • myrealitie

    I don’t understand what a “mean” is.

    [CensorBot sez: I know, the maths is hard.]

  • myrealitie

    How dare you censor me. I am a QUEEN and I will NOT be disrespected.

    [CensorBot sez: By leaving moronic comments, you are in violation of this site's Terms of Use. Further communication is at your own peril. In other words... LOLOLOLOLOLOL]

  • myrealitie

    Well, this blog is stupid. I didn’t want to comment here anyway.

    [CensorBot sez: Your bitterness is showing, baby.]

  • myrealitie

    It’s a hilarious blog, actually, and not a bad way to spend my time as I wait for my vegetables to saute so that I can put a pot roast in the oven for my very sexy man, one who does something valuable with his time. Because that’s what normal housewives do: flirt with strange men on the Internet. Right?

    Look, Matt, I love the manosphere. All these… men… around! They just make me giddy like a schoolgirl.

    Consider putting some balance in your posts. Have you ever read anything by Athol Kay? I like him because he waters down the truth enough that faux-submissive hausfraus like myself don’t get their feeeeeelings hurt.

    Do you really want to upset attention whoring strumpets like myself? That’s not going to get you any pats on the head from me, dear sir.

    Go Team Woman!

    [CensorBot sez: Revolting siren. Another female entryist who wants to emasculate the manosphere because it doesn't cater to her whims. Get you gone.]

  • https://www.facebook.com/DarthAurini Davis M.J. Aurini

    White Knights constantly support women, do their work for them, give them a hand up everywhere, and then claim that women are equal. What a joke.

  • Steve

    Matt: I don’t have a strong opinion on Neil DeGrasse Tyson one way or another. I’m curious to know what your beef with him is.

  • myrealitie

    Oh CensorBot, I can’t get enough of this abuse! Ooooh yes, right there, that’s PERFECT…

    [CensorBot sez: You bore me, woman. Go crochet a hat or something.]

  • http://mattforney.com/ Matt Forney

    Steve: Tyson is Carl Sagan in blackface (Sagan was also a fraud, but that’s a story for another time). Tyson has no substantive achievements to his name; the only reason he’s famous is because he can dumb down meaningful scientific concepts into snack-sized little factoids for the idiots to gnaw on. He’s part of the degeneration of science into cutesy pop culture junk food.

  • myrealitie

    SOMEBODY PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO MEEEEEE!!!!!!!!111

    [CensorBot sez: Comment number six. Your life is apparently so empty and meaningless that you have nothing better to do then go to a blog you dislike and get metaphorically micturated on. Reevaluate the choices that led you to this sorry state of affairs.]

  • AnonymousBosch

    The arrogance of university-educated women majoring in soft subjects is part of the problem. I suspect this line of reasoning happens:

    1. I’m going to University.
    2. University is only for intelligent people.
    3. Therefore, I’m intelligent.

    …Ignoring the fact that soft majors require very little intelligence, and that Cultural Marxism has polluted fields like Psychology into resembling pop culture babble. Given the degradation of journalism over the last 15 years, I suspect due to the influx of women into the field chasing ‘Sex In The City’ aspiration, I’d suspect that the majority of female-driven university subjects are aimed at those of 110 IQ or less: utterly mediocre thinkers who are incapable of independent thought, parroting back what they’re told for approval, which is why Feminist thinking stagnates and resembles Religion rather than Philosophy or Sociology.

    Women, so concerned with Social Approval, make for great parrots, but uncreative thinkers. Their mediocrity makes them interchangeable in the job market, hence $60,000 worth of education to work in the service industry until finding the ‘dream job’ they believe they’re ‘entitled’ to, only to abandon it in their late 30’s when the inevitable baby rabies sea change kicks in.

    So you have this mass of women with degrees who believe themselves to be Highly-Intelligent, rather than of Mediocre intelligence, which makes them dangerous due to their arrogance: they can’t conceptualise of Higher Thought than their own. I sit exactly on the +3 Standard Deviation, and am very humble when confronted by the possibility of higher intelligence than my own. Arrogant woman are incapable of that, unaware that, as intelligence increases, complexity of thought, particularly logical and abstract thought, vastly changes the way people think, and, as such, what strikes their 110 mindset as a perfectly-rational, bulletproof argument, reads as retarded thinking to someone like me, at 145.

    A 30 IQ point difference is all it takes for a higher intelligence to see mental retardation in the lower, and the lower to be incapable of the thought processes required to read anything other than insanity in the higher. It’s called the Communication Gulf. I stay humble by recognising that it’s entirely possible that my rational thought appears retarded to a more intelligent man than me. Arrogant, mediocre women are incapable of this, so respond with the kind of ill-informed drivel you get from your critics, not capable of even considering the possibility it might read like retarded drivel to other people, which I suppose spares them the social embarrassment of realising just how ridiculous their behaviour is.

    If I want True Communication with a woman, she has to be within 15 IQ points of me. With the lower mean IQ of female intelligence, and so few extreme outliers, that means I can only truly-communicate with something like 0.6% of women. This is like holding out for a magical unicorn. Therefore, I can either try to seek out intelligent women, with the result of dating women who consider themselves intelligent but are simply mediocre, retarded thinkers and unpleasant company due to their arrogance and vanity, or I can just fuck beautiful, stupid women who are pleasant company. Women who I never reveal my intelligence to, because, despite women saying they want ‘intelligent’ men – actually meaning rich and powerful men they can extract resources from or use to increase their social-standing – they’re quite happy to fuck dumb, muscular men on the road to the guy they believe they ‘deserve’, because fuck knows they wouldn’t offer Mr. RIght the respect of sexual-propriety in the meantime.

    Give an intelligent woman the appearance of a stereotype – in my case, the muscular blue collar biker – and she will never remotely-question that she’s responding to performance, not actuality, because mediocre thinkers believe in polarised-extremes and either / or propositions, particularly those that excuse them from personal effort: a bodybuilder must ‘be dumb’ and ‘compensating for something'; a fat woman must have a ‘nice personality’.

    Given the rise of Female Narcissism, where men are thought of as little more than actors in their play, devoid of their own agency and desires, giving off the appearance of an uncomplicated stereotype will you get far more pussy than mentally-challenging them.

  • robuno

    This article resonates deeply with me. You’ve hit the nail right on the head. The more emotional a woman is in the moment, the less sense you need to make. Nowadays, in conversations, I may decide to just claim some fucking nonsense and they still honestly think it’s a conversation. It amazes me. They couldn’t objectively view the logical patterns in a conversation if their life depended on it. PS. I enjoy your articles thoroughly.

  • John Pryce

    Reading this article was strange.

    It was a mix of facts, valid arguments, invalid arguments, outright falsehoods, and things that appeared to be said out of nothing but bitter anger.

    Some of it was quite valid; the part about the IQ scores matched what my own research has led me to believe. The implications of that, as described, were valid, as far as they went. Camille Paglia said much the same in a recent article.

    Section 2 stretched the point a little far. The language was obviously supposed to be provocative, and the fact that genuinely intelligent women do exist was acknowledged. The vapidness of modern women has less to do with _women_, as far as I see it, as it does to do with the trajectory of Western culture at this moment, however (especially the politically correct movement).

    Section 3 stayed closer to the facts, except for this bit:

    “The mass entry of girls into college and the workforce was instigated by corporate capitalists in order to drive down wages and smash workers’ rights.”

    This is of course not true, and the latter half of the sentence is explicitly Marxist. The linked article does not support this interpretation of events, either (yes, I did read it; the article described it as largely the aftereffects of the war and the cultural changes wrought by having so many women entering into previously male-dominated professions). Worker’s rights, per se, do not exist; rights are had by individuals qua individuals, not groups, and rights are the same across the board. It may well have interfered marginally with union bargaining and political power momentarily, but unions did not and by and large never have served much in the long-term interest of the average employee anyway – at least not to the extent that he held to any moral code at all.

    The rest of the article was largely the same mixed bag.

    Its very interesting to read something written by someone who is clearly so angry at the subject matter at hand, and yet is not so far gone as to take leave of his senses entirely. Usually someone like that runs out of facts and valid arguments at the beginning of an article, and by the end has long since degenerated into ranting.

  • http://aramaxima.wordpress.com aramaxima

    +1. Go Forney.

  • http://lizabethpaulat.wordpress.com lizabethpaulat

    I wanna make love to you.

    [CensorBot sez: Get in line.]

  • http://jaqenhghar.blogspot.com Jaqen

    I mostly agree, but I think the context of intelligence needs to be addressed.

    I went to a graduate professional (medical) school. Most of my classmates were female. There were definitely some smart women in our class, and several got over a 3.7, which is an impressive GPA for a medical program. Hardly any of them did poorly. However—-the highest (and lowest) scoring students in class were men. One guy had the highest GPA ever recorded in the program, and another had a PERFECT board score, which is almost unheard of. I had an average GPA but was in the top 3 for class board scores. So It got me thinking about what female intelligence actually is.

    Women have been shown to have higher average inter-hemisphere connectivity than men. Women also have higher verbal reasoning scores, and some disorders such as dyslexia have ten times the incidence in males as in females. In other words, cognitive function is Y-linked on many levels.

    My theory is that while women tend to excel memorizing and regurgitating information and following a protocol, they do not excel at critical thinking, abstract concepts, and dynamic problem-solving. Women’s social and linguistic brains are primed for academia, but when it’s time put put the hammer to nail and axe to the grindstone, they are utterly inferior at inventiveness, implementation, and critical decision-making. Hence why most of the great scientific and cultural discoveries and advents of modern times are attributable to men. Furthermore, it is not because women were “oppressed” for so long, otherwise we would be seeing a surge of female contributions to science, medicine, and technology over the last 50 years. We aren’t, and we are still waiting.

    Women think that because they can join the “boy’s club” that they are suddenly our intellectual equals. Academic statistics and female college enrollment numbers are not helping either. The female brain is inherently well-suited for academia, but beyond taking tests and taking notes, they tend to fall woefully short in areas of rationality that make a truly intelligent individual: introspection, objectivity, decisiveness, and a working knowledge of logical fallacies. And as always, the proof is in the pudding. Where are the contributions? Where are the great female leaders, inventors, producers, and industry pioneers. Few and far between.

    The social glorification of the feminine imperative has only made matters worse, and now their big girl panties are so inflated that they cannot realize or accept that men are the drivers of civilization and everything they take pride in today was made possible by men.

  • Mark

    If women were truly more intelligent than men they would all be voting in a completely different manner than they actually do. If you are smart, then you don’t need a massive cradle to grave welfare state to take care of you. Women in general vote left. Married white females are probably the most intelligent because they are least likely to vote for that. The 80 IQ black inner city high school dropout single mom is the polar opposite. Single white females are the swing vote in the middle that will probably decide the future of this country. From the single white females I personally know, that thought is a little bit scary but let’s hope that they take a more long term view instead of indulging in short term selfishness.

  • http://emmatheemo.wordpress.com Emma the Emo

    Matt,

    Have you ever wondered if this arrogance is just a facade? Praising a kid for their raw IQ leads to sad consequences for some (or I dunno, maybe even most) of those kids. They learn that intelligence is a part of their identity, and their ego depends on it. Then, when school gets tough (usually around college time), those kids don’t learn as effortlessly as before, and it feels like they are not as intelligent as they were told. This realization would break their ego if it happened. To avoid it, they only engage in easy tasks, to maintain the feeling of effortless learning. And they end up stupider and less educated than kids who were praised for effort, and not for raw IQ.

    If I was a sadist and wanted to create a generation of insecure, ego-protecting kids with badly developed minds, I’d praise them all for IQ early and as often as possible, and tell them college should be super easy for them and they can just breeze through it.

  • Pingback: Don’t Praise Your Daughter for Being Intelligent | Emma the Emo's Emo Musings

  • A.B Prosper

    Unfortunately the article is spot on. I’ve had the pleasure of meeting a few HI IQ women (130+ on the older harder tests) with actual abilities in Maths and science and problem solving and there are even a few public figures such as Dannica McKellar (who is at least quite good at Maths), Marilyn Vos Savant and the terrific Dr. Helen

    The bulk of them? No and hell no.

    That said today’s vapid chicks are a product of easy living. Pioneer women for example probably had much better problem solving skills even though they brain didn’t start with any more brain cells.

  • Pingback: Lightning Round -2014/04/09 | Free Northerner

  • Anonymous age 72

    I worked for 31 years in a high tech factory as an electronics technician. We had around 300 male technicians and maybe 20 females. The difference between techs was the ability to troubleshoot. (i.e. – diagnose problems.) Like anyone could run ordinary tests…

    We had what we called ‘super techs’. That is, men who could be relied on to find and solve the most difficult problems. Note that I said ‘men’ because while the women were good workers and stuck to it. Very seldom would you call in a woman to help solve a really hard problem.

    And, as I hope everyone clearly understands, most men were also not super-techs. And, we had some real dummies. We had one man so dumb he ran tests on military light bulbs. Better him than a smart man…

    As best as I could estimate by self-reporting the average male i.q. was around 135, probably not far from that for women. But, we had a couple men over 180, no women.

  • dan

    I really need a kick in the balls.

    [CensorBot sez: Impossible. You have no balls.]

  • ho

    What also needs to be adressed is the fact that modern tests are specifically made to accommodate women. If a test leads to divergent means between men and women, it’s considered “biased” because OF COURSE men and women are equal.

  • Vistoron

    Matt, you should know you are smart when the best engineer and inventor known to history shares similar beliefs with yours.
    http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla#Quotes_on_Feminism

  • baguazhang

    What passes for smart amongst women is being verbose in applying all the useless, relativist postmodern horseshit they learned in school in arguments ultimately intended to rationalize their emotions

  • Pingback: SUPPOSITIONS | Screw the Roses, Send in the Clowns

  • Robert What?

    Agree with most of what you say – however there is a good genetic reason for a man to have children with a woman who has at least something upstairs: boys inherit much of their intelligence from their mother (or more technically, their mother’s father). An intelligent man and a stupid woman have a chance to give birth to an intelligent girl. But a stupid woman will almost always have a stupid son regardless of the father.

  • slenkar

    it is a bad idea to find an intelligent woman because they don’t exist. Simple as that. Women’s brains are smaller and they waste what little IQ they have on silly things like celebrity gossip.

    So the basic premise of this article is totally right. (that there’s a choice between boobs and IQ)

    [CensorBot sez: Yup.]

  • Paige

    I would like to make love to this man.

    [CensorBot sez: Send nudes to therealmattforney [at] gmail [dot] com.]

  • egood

    Such a shame that I’m so dumb I don’t realize I’m dumb.

    [CensorBot sez: Exactly.]

  • http://gravatar.com/azizacloud Aziza

    I would like to have sex with you.

    [CensorBot sez: Get in line.]

  • thatoneguy1234

    At first I read this as satire for the first paragraph or two then things started to click with almost every prior observation I have made. Basically you put my thoughts into a neat organized blog. Oh and fuck De Grasse Tyson for getting Pluto kicked out as a planet!

  • Neelima

    Clearly you are part of the upper spectrum in the male intelligence graph :)

    [CensorBot sez: It's lonely being at the top.]

  • Neelima

    And it’s also clear that I want to fuck you.

    [CensorBot sez: Yes.]

  • http://gravatar.com/azizacloud Aziza

    I did say that I wish to have sex with you… right?

    [CensorBot sez: Of course you did, you silly little girl.]

  • http://burris.socialpsychology.org/ Christopher T. Burris PhD

    I’m a retard who still thinks that men make up the majority of college students, which hasn’t been the case for over a decade.

    [CensorBot sez: Where'd you get your PhD? The University of Phoenix?]

  • http://gravatar.com/abnor1 abnor

    Women doing anything is considered an anomaly because men are the standard… For everything. However it has only been a concept since about the 50’s. Before that women gained the right to vote in the 1910’s and started their own sexual liberation in the 1920’s, replaced men in the 1930’s and 40’s during the wars, and were forced back into the house post-war, which is where this whole woman-hating regime

    Since then men have been the standard. Bikes are manufactured and marketed to men, careers are manufactured and marketed to men, success is manufactured and marketed to men, even the BMI index, mental health practices, and the autism spectrum is manufactured and marketed to men. Women are considered a minority and are treated like shit because they don’t have the world built for them.

    However women hold the majority of degrees and hold the majority of the marketshare for purchasing power. They enjoy being treated as a separate entity to market towards, and thus marketed to they are.

  • http://redtube.com Peter

    I want a fat girl to buttfuck me with a candle.

    [CensorBot sez: Ew.]

  • Anonymous age 72

    More on the demographics mentioned. Based on the figures given by marketing experts, women spend every penny they personally earn, and also a full 50% of every cent all men in the USA make. And, that includes many men who are single and have nothing to do with women.

    And, what do men get in exchange for this 50% of every penny they make?

    As best as I can tell, most don’t even get any sex at all, those who do get really mediocre sex and very rarely.

  • http://caprizchka.wordpress.com caprizchka

    Thank you for this: “The gelded father telling his little princess that she can be whatever she wants to be, the slack-wristed orbiter who writes sweet nothings on her Facebook posts, the hipster nancyboy who claims he wants an “equal”: they are the enemy. Without them, the Katerinas of America would gladly kneel to their Petruchios. Because these genetic discards cannot compete with legitimate men, they encourage degeneracy in the vain hope of getting their dicks wet.”

    Whenever a man compliments my intelligence, I figure he wants my money, to steal and take credit for my work, or is looking for validation or redemption of his own poor choices. If it’s just pussy that he wants, that’s not nearly as big of a deal because I was one of those sluts you so decry. (Catch the past tense.)

    Perhaps women, white knights, and others with dopamine issues simply become addicted to praise. By the way, I agree with and followed Emma the Emo here.

    I’m too old for you and immune from your tactics, however it would seem from the comments herein that you are onto a winning seduction formula using humiliation. That’s very clever however it is short-sighted and ultimately self-defeating. It would seem that even one as intelligent as you has his blind spots. Of course, that merely makes you human.

    I read on your Facebook page that you’re a hitch-hiker–as was I when I was half your age but I probably had more fun at it than you do. The problem with growing up is that one eventually realizes how stupid one used to be. Be careful out there. I wouldn’t want you to miss that moment of clarity. :)

  • T. Donlevy

    I want to suck this man off.

    [CensorBot sez: Get in line.]

  • M. Finn

    I like it when fat girls sit on my face.

    [CensorBot sez: Not surprised.]

  • Team Women

    Hurr durr, I don’t know the difference between “woman” and “women.”

    [CensorBot sez: Plural and singular tenses, beotch!]

  • Phil Clark

    I’m a faux-intellectual dimwit.

    [CensorBot sez: Stop using big words, moron. You don't know what they mean.]

  • cam

    Please, I want to go down on you.

    [CensorBot sez: Nice.]

  • rosie

    Wow, I can’t believe men like this still exist. All these androgynous nancyboys are really giving me Sahara snatch. I need a REAL man.

    [CensorBot sez: As do many other women.]

  • MGSB

    I need a big ole buttplug in my ass.

    [CensorBot sez: Gross.]

  • Matt’s Secret Admirer

    I want to be your girlfriend.

    [CensorBot sez: Cool.]

  • Neil deGrasse Tyson’s Butt Boy

    Neil Degrasse Tyson has a physics degree from Harvard, two Masters degrees in in astronomy and astrophysics, and a doctorate in astrophysics, as well as having made significant contributions to astrophysics. His cock is also really tasty.

    [CensorBot sez: I'll bet.]

  • http://none Nova

    I want to suck your dick.

    [CensorBot sez: Typical.]

  • Clouds

    I want to get banged by this man.

    [CensorBot sez: Neato.]

  • Madeleine

    I want to lick your penis.

    [CensorBot sez: heh]

  • NK

    I’m offended.

    [CensorBot sez: Wah, go cry into your cups.]

  • Kerplunk

    I need a large phallic object in my ass.

    [CensorBot sez: Of course.]

  • Adam M

    My homoerotic fan fiction about you won’t fit in this comment box, but you can see the full thing here: [LINK REDACTED]

    [CensorBot sez: Go away, creep.]

  • Fat Ass Bitch

    I want to wrap my lips around your [CENSORED].

    [CensorBot sez: Redacted due to local laws.]

  • lxc

    Because women’s IQs have a smaller standard deviation then men’s it’s a waste of time for them to cultivate their minds? That seems like a gratuitous waste of human capital.

    Can’t we just say all the people who cluster around the mean (or fall below it) should shut up and sit down?

    Also, I think your regard for women would increase if you stopped hanging around with Humanities majors. My regard for men did.

  • jeremy

    I need a huge buttplug in my ass.

    [CensorBot sez: Yup.]

  • corey

    I need to get plugged up the butt by a fat girl.

    [CensorBot sez: Shaddup.]

  • Monica Kincaid – Warner

    I’m a sad fat chick who fantasizes about Neil deGrasse Tyson shagging me rotten.

    [CensorBot sez: U gross.]

  • Bloop

    I wanna bang you.

    [CensorBot sez: Yep.]

  • tomato8ish .

    Oh man, i feel sorry for the poor woman that will get stuck with your ass.
    Your whole blog is actually really entertaining, if taken in the context of comedy. I wonder how your own mother would reflect on your phrase, “Without a man to fill her with his essence, she is as useless as a crabapple [sic] rotting on the sidewalk.” Does it follow then that man is as useless as a rotting crab apple if his seed is not received?

    You seem to think you’re providing insightful and empowering knowledge to an audience of low-testosterone-mid-life-crisis guys, personally, you sound like an eloquent child furious that the world is progressing. Where did all this hate come from? Perhaps it stems from the realization that women have options when picking their partners and they don’t have to settle for someone with such a toxic outlook on society.

    As i’m sure you’ve guessed, i’m a woman. All i ask is the freedom to pursue a career of my choice, with equal opportunities as my fellow man. Men and women are always heading towards the same fate; death. Our paths leading up to that point are infinitely diverse, although the common theme is a desire for self-improvement. Instead of trying to stifle the development of 50% of the world’s population by calling them stupid, you should swallow your self-righteous attitude and learn some respect, of course then you wouldn’t have much writing material…

    I’ll never understand where people get this grotesque sense of superiority.

  • pzp

    It sounds like you’re hanging around some really dumb broads. Considering the context of your articles, I can see why that may be the case.

  • Steve Corner

    Because a mere blog is going to “stifle” all of womandom.

  • http://caprizchka.wordpress.com Caprizchka

    –only those women who can’t handle the truth. It’s a paradox because handling the truth requires a certain amount of intelligence. Those of us who have it however are willing to sacrifice our “rights” if only the rest of womanhood would do the same–it would be so worth it not to have to answer to petty bureaucrats of all persuasions and a “democracy” run by those least equipped to do so.

    “Respect” just for having a pussy doesn’t actually rock my world. “Authority” that is unearned always backfires. Human beings who put fantasy-ideology above pragmatism or even simple mathematics are not actually “intelligent” enough to run the world. While the logic of this article will be lost on the idiocracy eventually one would hope that cooler minds will assert their primacy. It can’t happen soon enough in my view. Sandwiches anyone?

  • Steve Corner

    I would say “go make me a sandwich,” but tomato8ish might call me a rape apologist, or some other social justice euphemism she saw on buzfeed, Huff Post, or Jezbel…but thanks anyways ;)

  • http://www.judgybitch.com Janet Bloomfield

    Matt doesn’t put rose petals in the toilet before he shits, but trust me, his shit is real. And so is this. Men outnumber women at the high end of the intelligence scale by at least 6:1 but more likely 8:1, and even when women do test with very high IQs, they are still brainless bimbos who want to be showgirls. Google “Her IQ is as high as Einsteins” if you doubt that.

    What I will disagree with heartily is that intelligence in a woman is not attractive to a man. Intelligence alone? Nope. Who gives a fuck. But combine higher than average intelligence with better than average good looks, graciousness, goodheartedness and cheerfulness and a very healthy sexual appetite focused on mutual pleasure and that is a killer fucking combo.

    Women used to be taught to aspire to this ideal. Now they are only taught to act like entitled bitches with inflated egos who think they are better than men.

    I don’t mind. Less competition, quite frankly.

    Yeah, yeah, I really am that arrogant. Deal with it.

  • guber

    Haha, that’s an awesome article. But you gotta get your history straight Mr.

    “Women’s suffrage was only passed into law in the U.S. because leftist Protestants in the Republican Party wanted to ensure an electoral majority for Prohibition and other “social purity” policies. ”

    You got the “leftist Protestant” right but “republican party”? You should have said “democrat” party. Don’t you know that Woodrow Wilson was a democrat? Don’t you realize that temperance movement and other fascist sentimental nonsense is the hallmark of Progressive Era social gospel protestants. You see the leftists. So, say democrat party. May be you’re saying that then started the sell-out of the establishment Reps? Perhaps there you do have a point.

  • JustUs4Awe

    I can see from your blogs that you are angry that women are smarter than you otherwise you wouldn’t feel the need to degrade and abuse them.

  • ducdebrabant

    “Instead of trying to stifle the development of 50% of the world’s population by calling them stupid” Did you read?? Oh, the irony.

  • tomato8ish .

    Steve, you’re right, it probably won’t, but the pervasive belief that a woman’s whole existence is for the purpose of serving men is being reinforced and that’s an incredibly debilitating ideology if you’re a member of the female sex. Forney’s material is a result of the injustices he feels as a man set in Western society, rather than attesting it to society’s overall complex of imbalances that makes life unfair for us all, he sets out to denigrate women to establish himself as a “real man”.
    Respect is something earned, not something you receive because you were born of a certain sex.
    I wouldn’t mind making you a sandwich, dinner, doing your laundry, or giving you a blowjob given the request was within a reciprocal relationship of love and respect. In fact if the relationship was so fantastic you wouldn’t even have to ask! I don’t identify myself as a feminist, nor am i an avid reader of the sites you’ve listed, i’m simply a supporter of healthy relationships which flourish best when both members are able to simple “be”. This child masqueraded in the guise of a worldly intellectual is spewing some pretty toxic shit, hopefully there aren’t many lapping it up…

  • Aleksandra Nikolaevna

    What is it with you people and maths? I always found it rather boring. (and no, my IQ is not average)

  • MitchellFinnic

    “So it is with the myth of female intelligence. Girls believe they are smart, worldly and cultured because men lie and white knight for them. The gelded father telling his little princess that she can be whatever she wants to be, the slack-wristed orbiter who writes sweet nothings on her Facebook posts, the hipster nancyboy who claims he wants an “equal”: they are the enemy. Without them, the Katerinas of America would gladly kneel to their Petruchios. Because these genetic discards cannot compete with legitimate men, they encourage degeneracy in the vain hope of getting their dicks wet.”

    I myself am the product of these “lies.” My father encouraged me and told me I could be whatever I wanted. How DARE he?!? So, I earned a Bachelor of Science in Biology with an emphasis in Biomechanics, attended graduate school, and now I fit and fabricate prosthetic limbs. You know, the fancy bionic ones? I’m considering getting my Ph. D but we will see. It’s weird what a little encouragement and self-belief can do for a woman.

    As for the second part, the “hipster nancyboy?” I’m afraid he is fairing much better than you. My husband (not a nancyboy, I can assure you ;) ) is sitting next to me in bed laughing because, in the game of life, he won.

    You think you have the right idea oppressing women? Is that *just* getting you all the babes; telling them to quiet down and go back to the kitchen? How’s that working out for you? Is this behavior getting your dick “wet?”

    Unless you start treating women as equals, no woman who is your equal will put up with you. These intelligent, fun, interesting women will just leave and you will be left with women who don’t mind being treated poorly, and then you will bemoan all women for being stupid. Uff dah.

    I for one, am so thankful for my “white knights,” male and female, for not bridling my potential with sexist stereotypes. I hope I can do the same for others.

  • MitchellFinnic

    dafuq? Excuse me, but where are your sources for this tasty little bit of genetic inheritance patterning? Please, do tell.

  • Matt Aleshire

    Don’t worry, Matt. You’ll soon have the right to marry in your state.

  • Steve Corner

    More male-bashing….gee…what a shock.

  • Sarah Wilson

    What happened in your life to make you hate women so much? I feel sorry for you because it must have been so awful to give you such an inflated sense of superiority,

    I’m a woman and majored in Math, and got better grades than many male class mates so where is the logic there? However I do not feel that I am of any more worth than anyone because of it, which is the problem you seem to be suffering from. Your sweeping generalizations are massively flawed and you clearly lack proper research. The only reason why your articles get any attention is because of sheer ridiculousness and outdated opinions, not because of their ‘wonderful insightful’ contents, or ‘brilliant’ writing.

    I hope you find a way to deal with your irrational fear and denial of intelligent women, maybe some therapy would help?

  • k8

    Even as a woman, I’ve noticed this as well. I a friend who is doing a graduate degree and she has ridiculously high standards for any man that wants to date her. She seems to think that all these top tier men should want to date her for her “intelligence”, and she’s always calling other women bimbos for not going through years and years of university education, even those those girls are vastly more successful in getting the kind of men she wants. What’s worse, she’s not even that smart. She has the least intellectual curiosity out of everybody I know, and even my boyfriend has remarked on how uninteresting her conversation is. It’s really unfortunate, because she is a really good, kind and loyal person and would actually make a fantastic wife and mother. Her arrogance though, will ensure that she remains single for the rest of her life unless some kind of miracle happens.

    That being said, I don’t think all women are stupid. My mother, despite never having graduated from primary school, is one of the most intelligent people I know. She reads really hardcore history books and Tang and Song dynasty poetry for fun. She is also a genius at fixing things. Being an intelligent woman, she married my father (who is wealthy), had kids, and spends her time doing what she likes, instead of slaving away in some office with a group of catty office ladies for decades.

  • Natasha

    I’m just assuming that you wrote this to get a reaction. I’m assuming that you want to shock and offend people so that you can get more hits on your blog and make money from the advertisements.
    I’m a female Electrical Engineer and I’m not going to waste any more of my time reading this garbage.

  • Rebecca Hodle

    People actually agree with this guy??! I thought this was an attempt to be funny. I didn’t realize he wants people to take him seriously. I’ve been duped. It must be because I’m less intelligent than the people who believe this junk. Ignorance really is bliss!

  • TheBiloi

    What you have to understand is that this blog is on the same level as HuffPost and other far-left sites. Its main purpose is for getting clicks through provocative article titles. Then there are the mentally-deranged who actually share the article’s views. I abhor modern day feminism, but I find this entire website absolutely absurd. I don’t think we should get too worked up about it as you pretty much nailed it. Matt is just a genetically unfortunate fat bald man. His opinions on what makes “a good woman” aren’t really of value to actual high-value men and women. I truly pity anyone whose life revolves around “game” and sex. If enjoyable sex is something that you have to write strategic articles about instead of just experiencing in your day-to-day life and relationships, then your character is lacking in some much-needed humanity.

    And to state that intelligence is far down on the list of what makes a woman attractive is outright laughable. But it makes sense for people like Matt to only be attracted to what’s attainable.

  • tomato8ish .

    Right… I think you need to revise the concepts of the English language once more, your comprehension is lacking my friend.

  • Steve Corner

    Actually, I’m an English major. But continue…it’s quite entertaining.

  • nunyabidnessfoo

    Hi I’m 15 and just read Atlas Shrugged too. Let’s be friends!

  • nunyabidnessfoo

    Women do not have a lower mean IQ. They have a smaller variance of IQ.

  • kellin myers

    I’m just curious, you say that “intelligent” women often settle for soft degrees such as acting, english, etc.. and you bash them for doing so. I assume that you believe yourself to be intelligent, but in your bio, it says you have been educated in english and journalism, a soft major. How can you bash intelligent women for doing so, but do so yourself, unless you don’t consider yourself intelligent?

  • ripov

    she is eating you for lunch and yes, it is entertaining.

  • Sam

    Women just don’t seem to get the big picture. They lack a curiosity about the world and creativity that intelligent men have. I think the crux of the issue is that women are unable to disengage mentally from status seeking which is an innately false and manipulative practice. Conformity as a survival adaptation is wired too deeply into the feminine consciousness to allow for meaningful objective intellectual analysis. The female brain is wired for conformist social cohesion and the male brain is wired for problem solving.

  • Moni1111

    I think Marilyn Vos Savant, Marie Curie, Joy Adamson, Mary Anning, the four year old female with a mensa iq, Clara Barton, and Ruth Benedict among others would beg to differ. One scientist states that men are more intelligent, yet the orthodoxy in intelligence research for the second half of the 20th century has been that men and women have the same average intelligence. Also, most imbeciles were men, while most women were in the normal range. Deal with facts.

  • Steve Corner

    “eating me for lunch” “Male-bashing” Yeah…I’ve said this already. Yawn….

  • Taelor Pelusey

    Is this satire? I can’t tell. I’m just a girl …

  • Taelor Pelusey

    Yeah, that was my initial thought as well. As a Journalism/Economics student I started to work myself up a bit (that damn oestrogen!) but I had a look around and saw he’s got a couple of books and an e-book dedicated to making money online through blogging – presumably by generating traffic. I’m sure this clusterfuck of an article as well as other beauties like “How To Beat Your Girlfriend Or Wife And Get Away With It” have generated a shit-tonne – regardless of whether or not he believes the bullshit he’s spinning.

  • pauldrake

    I never met you so I can’t verify or refute your superior intelligence
    or lack thereof. What is more likely is that somewhere there is a man
    with career aspirations thwarted to make room for you. Of course, I
    could be wrong, as I don’t know you and more than likely never will. As
    for your hero lying in bed next to you. I’d say there’s at least a 70%
    chance of you making a cuckold out of him somewhere along the line.
    White knights are a dime a dozen, even to intelligent, successful high
    income women like you. One last thing. I bear you no ill will, but just
    be aware that when the collapse comes, and it will, your beta boy white
    knight is going to need lots of help from men like me. The kind of man
    you probably wouldn’t spit on.

  • MitchellFinnic

    You’re right about one thing; obviously you haven’t met me. Firstly, I didn’t “thwart’ (good word choice, though) anyone’s aspirations- my employers (male and female) chose me as the person in whom they would invest a great deal of money. I beat out many other men and women for this position based on my capabilities, not my biological sex. I bet I would beat you too because I am damn good at my job. Secondly, a 70% chance that I will cuckold my husband? That seems inordinate considering I have never cheated on anyone in my whole life. Where are you getting this percentage? Are you a statistician? Sounds like you’re just being bitter and cynical. You might want to work on that. Lastly, let me be clear; a bigot is EXACTLY the kind of man on whom I would spit. ;)

  • MitchellFinnic

    Women are the primary purchasers for entire households. That means that more women than men are making the purchasing choices for multiple individuals. For example, when a man and a woman both make twenty dollars but the woman goes to the grocery store and spends the thirty dollars on things they *both* consume. If men really don’t like it, then they should start doing more of the shopping. I’m sure Mr. Clean could easily be changed to Ms. Clean to advertise to men if that is what the market demanded.

  • pauldrake

    Bigot. Racist. Sexist. Misogynist. So many words the PC Thought Police have rendered meaningless. You’d NEVER pick me out in a crowd. In fact if you met me there’s a good chance you’d feel comfortable and laugh although I doubt you would even friend zone me. As for your job, like I said I’m not sure. And yes I would be thoroughly incompetent at what you do. I do know of more than one concern that buried itself trying to do the AA thing for women and minorities. In fact I worked for a company that had to sell out because they made so many mistakes and lost clients trying to make a “level playing field.” Now for the cuckold thing. Let’s just say I have access to some credible research on the subject and I have observed many couples in my own generation. The cheating rate is astounding and women have all but caught up to men in that regard. Women of your education, status and above average intelligence out in the business world are especially prone. Sometimes you (speaking in general terms here) need a little diversion, a bad boy, a company superstar, or just some tall dark stranger. It happens. ALL THE TIME. So I put it at 70%, so 30% chance you won’t. So anyway I bear you no ill will. Even if you think I’m a bigot and wouldn’t bother spitting on me. That makes me beta blue boy to many in the manosphere but I’m older than most here and very comfortable with myself and all my talents, virtues, faults and failures.

  • MitchellFinnic

    Again, where are your sources? Please share them. If you only have anecdotal evidence (i.e. personal experience), then I am afraid your source is invalid and unreliable. If you happen know more men that have been cuckolded than women who have been cheated upon then congratulations! You probably surround yourself with good, loyal men who most unfortunately chose untrustworthy women. That does not mean that there are not just as many men out there who will cheat on perfectly good woman- you just might not associate with those men. Obviously your subjective opinion is skewed to be unflattering toward women. Does that mean that 70% of women in my position cheat? Not at all. Furthermore, it is highly unfair to suggest that I, personally, will most likely cheat on my husband. Every individual is different, and making sweeping allegations about me based on my status, intelligence, and sex is an example of bigotry. Hope this helps clarify!

    P.S. of course I wouldn’t “friend-zone” you! I am married so I can’t friend-zone anyone (I mean, I guess *technically* I could, but that would be a very strange circumstance). To be friend-zoned requires that I am single but only interested in being friends. That would be like hitting on a married friend of yours, trying to make a move on her (even though she is married), and then saying you got friend-zoned when she was faithful to her husband and turned you down! That’s silly.

  • pauldrake

    Do you know who the “real Paul Drake” is? Research has been my life since childhood. It’s out there if you care to look for it, if you are unwilling to give me credibility, which given the state of the internet may not be a bad idea. I think you are a twenty or early thirty something, the most badly educated generation except for those coming after you. Just keep your eyes and ears open and you’ll see that my cynicism is well founded. On that note “arrivederci” and best of luck to you and yours. I’m not going to get vanilla for you though. Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind and that is just what our decaying dying western society is doing. The twain never shall meet so I bid you good day.

  • MitchellFinnic

    ARE YOU THE REAL PAUL DRAKE?!?! OMG I HAD NO IDEA!!!! (being facetious)

    But seriously, that was rude. While I don’t really get my feelings hurt about anything on the internet, I was trying to have a conversation, and on top of telling me that I most likely achieved my career based on my gender (questioning my intelligence and capabilities) and that it is 70% likely that I will cheat on my husband (questioning my moral character), you tell me that mine is the worst educated generation and that we will be the ruin of western society (questioning my patriotism). You saying this is analogues to me saying, “I can’t wait until all the older generations die off so that all their antiquated ideas die with them and we won’t have to be saddled with the burden of their idiocy.” Now that’s not very nice, is it?

  • pauldrake

    Oh boy I must really be weak where you are concerned. Your generation is badly, horribly educated. Subject of a Frankenstein experiment that is working very well indeed. You know the great movie The Treasure of Sierra Madre where the Mexican bandito tell Humphrey Bogart “I don’t have to show you no stinking badges!” Well I don’t need no stinking research for that one. It’s obvious to any sentient being with a high two digit IQ and I am far from the only person who believes this to be true. I did have a very short unhappy career as a history teacher however. Wow. I’m thinking I’m coming off to you like the most sensitive blue beta boy wimp and you say I’m insulting you. What are you going to do when confronted with the real fire breathers on the manosphere sites? Again, the 70% comment seems to really anger you and hurt your feelings, and that was not my intention. I just have a very blunt no BS approach to life in person and cyberspace. I may not be enough red meat red pill for some around here but I’ve been a realist since childhood, and I have lived a very real life.. So just ferociously love your husband come hell or high water and make me wrong. I’m fine with that. As for this comment “I can’t wait until all the older generations die off so that all their
    antiquated ideas die with them and we won’t have to be saddled with the
    burden of their idiocy.” Now that’s not very nice, is it?

    No it’s not nice but at some points in history it’s been true. This just isn’t one of those times. Unfortunately when all hell breaks loose many will miss the “idiocy” they freed themselves from.

  • ThomasER916

    I worked for Lucent Technologies and I found something even more startling. Nearly every women that was on the highest level of technical achievement suffered from a hereditary female baldness. I was discovered this when working in Migrations, moving and relocating personnel and PCs, because I had to shoulder surf and talk them through the checklist prepared by section managers. I don’t doubt for a moment that a distinct change in brain chemistry produces highly technical engineers in women and men, while simultaneously producing similar patterns in baldness.

  • ThomasER916

    Nothing you said had any basis in this topic or discussion whatsoever. Your Litany of PC Libtarded BS is nothing more than the mantras of Useful Idiots. You think you’re here making a valid point but you’re not.

    “Unless you start treating women as equals…”

    Or what? Women will turn into horrifying bitches? Too late. Already happened and women are MORE than equals de jure and de facto. So treating women as equals resulted in Animal Farm where every women is legally an insufferable tyrannical bitch.

    The plain and simple fact is when a woman like you reads from the Litany of Cultural Marxism they’ve clearly indicated they’re stupid, indoctrinated, and toxic.

    bigot
    sexist
    oppressing

    You missed a few buzzwords from the Litany. Your agitprop is not Double Plus on Good.

  • ThomasER916

    The Republican Party is a Political Party. Saying “right” or “left” in Politics is pretty much worthless. Not entirely worthless, but mostly. You are correct about the “Progressives.” Though, fascism is preferable to the ethno-masochism we’re living through today.

  • ThomasER916

    Actually he’s right. Neil de Grasse Token is a fraud. He’s nothing more than an Affirmative Action Minstrel Show for Scientism.

  • ThomasER916

    He has a Right to bash those women because they demand OTHER women become scientists when they clearly didn’t. Women choose to not be scientists then bitch about it. Just like women choose to work less hours and therefore get less experience, are less reliable and receive less pay. What do they do? They bitch about it. What’s worse is rather than simply bitch they collective pass Legislation to destroy the men who are scientists, engineers, and doctors while they’re still in action, English, etc and now an entire country suffers from their collective narcissism and stupidity.

  • ThomasER916

    And this is why women aren’t scientists, engineers, CEOs, or economists. Even if you have an “average” IQ you’re not interested. Then what do you do when you discover men make more money? You bitch about it and collectively pass Legislation to punish men for creating wealth and reliable data.

    What you find “boring” is precisely why you make less than men.

  • ThomasER916

    Nothing you will say will “prove him wrong” in any way. In fact, your inability to understand what he’s saying is proving the opposite. You’ll be in “hell” but it will be a Turd World hell created by Mass Turd World immigration due to IQ denying idiots like yourself.

  • ThomasER916

    The problem is you’re not “just a girl”, you’re stupid, indoctrinated, and a Cultist, which is why you’re here. Even if it was “satire” you still wouldn’t get it.

  • ThomasER916

    The problem is everything you said is wrong. Women do need to understand how to please men otherwise they’ll have to settle for dying alone or being with manipulative losers. Furthermore, a woman’s intelligence needs functionality. An intelligent woman that’s merely a debt-ridden, insufferable bitch is worse than useless, they’re toxic and again deserve to die alone or have their genes banished to the outskirts where it will dwell among the dysfunctional.

    Women are men’s objects of sexual desire because that’s how biology reproduces. I have to explain where babies come from because you’re stupid and indoctrinated. Did you understand that? Probably not. If men do not desire women then they will not be a husband or create a family. Then when you’re desperate you’ll find a loser who will lie and pass his low-IQ on to your children and you’ll have wasted the rest of your life screaming “discrimination” and “racism” because you birthed low-iQ trash.

    The “shame” is the delusion that men and women shouldn’t desire one another or please one another. That kind of profound, Feminist stupidity is the commandments of an ethno-masochist.

  • ThomasER916

    And what did they do besides live in a world built by men? Women are a petulant leisure class in the 1st world, a world created by White men and ruined by fat slobs like yourself.

    Deal with the facts. Country bumpkins like Philo Farnsworth accomplished more in his life-time than those pampered women accomplished with decades of complaining combined. He built this modern world along with other men like Elon Musk who have surpassed every country on earth and billions of women in raw brain power of technical expertise reaching beyond the limits of the earth when women are only able to raise a few inches in heels. Men built this world, not women. Men defended this world, not women. Men are responsible for this modern world – White men. These actual facts, these real facts, will Trigger you.

  • ThomasER916

    The guy who replied to you (ripov) is a typical, Post-Modern, White-Knight, ethno-masochist raised by a single mom. He’s a degenerate who’s so scarred he cannot identify what is good and bad, right and wrong. You’ll find the men that instinctively hate children, family, and other men were raised by women who felt the same and thoroughly poisoned them. He believes he’s being righteous by attacking men for women’s failures. Think about the excuses and delusions of single mothers and you’ll find how that was imprinted on these beta-males. It’s not their fault, but they’re the problem children that we’re now forced to deal with.

  • Taelor Pelusey

    And stupid. And indoctrinated.

  • MitchellFinnic

    How does what I originally stated have nothing to do with the article? I disagreed with the author’s opinion that men should not encourage women and then offered my own personal experience as an example of what can happen when a woman has strong, supportive men and women in her life. Women should support men and men should support women. It shouldn’t be this vicious, competitive, battle of the sexes because that is counterproductive. That is what the original article perpetuates; gender wars. I disagreed with it.

    As for the comments that ensued; I am simply replying to my fellow commenter. We were both being civil but apparently what I had to say moved you to the point that you felt it necessary to start this tangent about some different issues other than what I had originally posted.

    Your opinions are your opinions. I can not change them and I will not try. I can only change myself. I will say that you were correct; instead of the word ‘equality’ I should probably use the word ‘equity,’ as it is more accurate.

    Is the average woman as strong or as fast as the average man? No. These are not points I am arguing. Men and women are different, I didn’t claim that they weren’t. However, I don’t think that you should treat women as inferior because some women happen to be worse at certain things than some men. Likewise, I don’t think society should treat men as inferior because they happen to be worse at certain things than women. That is what I meant by equality.

    And as for intelligence, I feel that no matter what metric you use it will have its faults. For example, it’s my opinion that standardized tests do not adequately capture a person’s intelligence. Do I believe that the majority of women are less intelligent than the majority of men? No. I think that both sexes have their own cognitive advantages, but that either sex can become an expert in most subjects with various amounts of work. Not everyone will become an expert in their field, but how do you know what they are capable of unless they are encouraged to try? Would you tell a five-year-old that he should not study how stars work because there is absolutely no possibility that he could become an astrophysicist? If everyone did this, then where would all the astrophysicists come from? You need to believe in people regardless of biological sex. I think that the talents of many people of all sexes have been truncated by this discouragement.

    Do I believe that many, MANY people of both sexes are frivolous, self-centered, and morally corrupt? Yeah, probably, but I don’t have to like it. I definitely don’t have to stand by as people erroneously claim that “every woman is legally an insufferable tyrannical bitch” without standing up for myself, my mom, my sister, and all the other women whom I know are contrary to this statement.

  • Steve Corner

    I’ve noticed. LOL

  • MitchellFinnic

    Neither one of us is a generational expert, obviously. Since you’re not into sharing scholarly articles and opinions (such as ours) vary greatly on this point, we will simply have to agree to disagree. I am currently reading up on some studies on differences between the millennial generation and previous generations. I encourage you to do the same! I hope for both of our sakes you’re wrong about the millennial generation, but truthfully only time will tell.

  • ThomasER916

    “Your opinions are your opinions.”

    There you go again off on another tangent to justify your stupid bullshit. The problem is your brain is so full of bullshit that when combined with your instinctive Narcissism you always veer off course. No one ever said, “All women are dumb.” In fact, the top comment is a woman who understands statistics, and that’s precisely what this article is about.

    You may be getting your PhD but you’re a fucking idiot. Did you understand that? No. Of course you didn’t.

  • MitchellFinnic

    “No one ever said, “All women are dumb.”” … the title of this essay is “The Myth of Female Intelligence” which implies that female intelligence is a myth. i.e. women are not smart.

    It is simply amazing- people never fail to rise to the occasion. I was being totally civil and you immediately resorted to name-calling?

    How was my response a tangent? You brought these topics up and I addressed them. Typically that is how correspondence works.

    More importantly, why are you *so* very mad? I have not once been mean or degrading towards you or any other men. You just seem… so mad…?! like verbal fisticuffs mad…

  • MitchellFinnic

    Obviously neither of us is a generational expert. Because you are not interested in sharing sources and opinions on this subject vary greatly (such as ours) we will just have to disagree. I know I will be doing more research on the differences between millennials and previous generations, I encourage you to do the same! I hope that, for both our sakes, you are wrong.

  • Dave Kinard

    Ethno-masochist?

  • Dave Kinard

    If your master manly race is so superior, then how has its power managed to erode so?

  • Dave Kinard

    Wait, are you really THE REAL Paul Drake?

  • Dave Kinard

    Wait, I thought Einstein was a girl?

  • Dave Kinard

    You’re surprised that these guys resorted to name calling?

  • Dave Kinard

    He’s a badass.

  • Dave Kinard

    and don’t forget, a degenerate ethno-masochist who’s bringing down civilization! What fun!

  • MitchellFinnic

    No, I can’t say that I’m surprised! This is the internet after all.

  • MitchellFinnic

    No, I can’t say that I’m surprised! This is the internet after all.

  • pauldrake

    Studies on infidelity are all over the map. Buss and Shackelford estimated a cheating rate of between 30-60%. Anderson found that 2-3% of children are not the biological progeny of the man in a marriage. Other studies have found a rate above 10% in certain sub groups. It is really hard to get accurate data on exactly what the divorce rate is in the US do to faulty interpretation of data. For instance if the number of marriages in a given year is double the number of divorces it doesn’t necessarily translate to a 50% divorce rate. However http://www.politifact.com recently estimated a divorce rate in excess of 40%. A Wall Street Journal study found that people in your age cohort are more sexually active before marriage than previous generations and as a result infidelity is becoming more common among those under 30 and married. More women in the workforce and changing technology has made opportunities to stray more numerous and easier than in the past. Barash and Lipton have found long term monogamy to be difficult but not impossible. The University of Arizona did an extensive study on sexual fantasies of young college age women. Hicks and Leitenberg found that almost everyone fantasizes about having sex with someone not their spouse or partner. A study I personally conducted in the 1980’s found a cheating rate of 65% for males and 35% for women among Baby Boomers. I could go on and on and on. Now how about real life? Like I tried to tell you before professional women cheating on their spouses happens with depressing regularity. You want me to name names on the internet it ain’t gonna happen. Western societies have fallen prey to the cultural marxist crowd abandoned their traditions and the results aren’t pretty. Open your eyes, if you need a link for this then I give up. I know as a twenty something you are not privy to what we were compared to where we are now but you have parents, relatives, friends, books and periodicals to consult. As for the education part. How about this from the very liberal Huffington Post? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/12/1912-eighth-grade-exam_n_3744163.html There are literally dozens and dozens of similar examples and they aren’t hard to find. Now as for your generation. The leftist cultural marxist crowd pretty much had hegemony over public education by the time your group came along. You’ve been indoctrinated into every ism and the majority of you have swallowed it hook, line and sinker. Enjoy paying the 20+++ trillion debt your political heroes has saddled you with. At this point I’m reaching the pain threshold and wondering if you’re not trolling me. The internet can be a wonder but it’s still not suitable for real intellectual discourse but God knows with you I have tried.

  • ThomasER916

    You really are stupid.

  • ThomasER916

    There you are being stupid again.

  • ThomasER916

    No, that’s your rectal prolapse.

  • ThomasER916

    Once again, your rectal prolapse is showing.

  • ThomasER916

    So what you’re saying is you simply read the title and then posted your idiot bullshit? That sounds about right.

    “How was my response a tangent?”

    Because you’re posturing and back-patting is precisely what this article was about while missing the obvious details. The fact that you can’t make it past a headline serves as evidence enough. However, since you’re rendered utterly stupid from indoctrination you’re missing key information that was highlighted in red so even a Useful Idiot like you would get it.

    This is the very first enumerated section:

    “men have a wider standard deviation while females cluster around the middle. In layman’s terms, this means that there are more intelligent men than there are intelligent girls. At the same time, it also means that there are more unintelligent men then unintelligent girls, which is why the short bus tends to be a sausage fest. The “dumb bimbo” stereotype is a fiction invented by ugly girls.”

    I have to repeat what was in the article because your brain is completely full of bullshit and you’re triggering. You’d think that someone who wants to be a PhD could read an article. However, considering that Universities are no longer a place of academic excellence but Political Correctness I’m sure you’ll do just fine in expanding your agitprop.

  • ThomasER916

    misogynist
    bigot
    racist
    homophobe

    You’re a Cultist who screams agitprop 24/7 and now, all of a sudden, you’re clutching your pearls when someone dares to tell you you’re full of bullshit, because you are full of bullshit. You don’t give a crap about “name calling.” You, like this dickless faggot Dave Kinard, are nothing more than Useful Idiots who are programmed to engage in agitprop. That’s why you can’t read an article past a headline and Dave is being a typical beta faggot.

    Right about now you should be Triggering again because I said “faggot.”

    Of course, you’re indoctrinated to posture moral enlightenment, attack, and sermonize. Your religion is your Political Correctness.

  • MitchellFinnic

    I’m not clutching my pearls, what gave you that idea? You in no way, shape, or form present even the slightest threat to me and to other successful women like myself.

    Despite what you seem to believe, you have no more called me on my bullshit than I have called you out on your’s. My “bullshit” as you so called it, is my opinion. I simply stated that your opinion is your’s and mine is mine, and now you’re getting mad about it. I did not dismiss your opinion. I just disagree with it, which, thankfully, I am allowed to do.

    All of your verbal thrashing really has no effect on my life. You are just upsetting yourself. Watch out for your blood pressure!

    What was truly an entertaining exchange has now become tiresome, as you only wish to mud-sling and name-call. I hope you have a good rest of your life, I know I will in spite of all your very bizarre insults.

  • ThomasER916

    When I said you’re indoctrinated to posture enlightenment and sermonize, I wasn’t kidding. Since you’re really stupid and indoctrinated you can’t understand this, but you’ll continue doing so. Here was your latest example:

    “You are just upsetting yourself.”
    No I’m not.

    “Watch out for your blood pressure!”
    You’ve already admitted you’re not a doctor. You really are full of bullshit. You’re so full of bullshit you believe you’re a doctor that can give a valid diagnosis over the internet.

    “I hope you have a good rest of your life, I know I will in spite of all your very bizarre insults.”
    That was a nice ending to your PC Agitprop Sermon.

  • Abby

    That’s hilarious considering the above talks about dumb females doing english majors.

  • Carrie

    Hmm, you outed yourself in your second sentence as not knowing what you are talking about. “Women need to understand how to please men otherwise they’ll have to settle for dying alone”. That is bound to make a LOT of people laugh, perhaps mostly women, who last we checked are turning marriage down in favor of the better choice of *living alone and skipping marriage by choice, since we work decent jobs and have enough money to support ourselves*. Marriage has never been so pointless and unnecessary for women as it is now.

    It is not “settling”, it is the preferred AIM of remaining unmarried. Honestly, get that outrageous ego in check. Men are not the ones being pursued in marriage, women are. Men are nice, yes, but superfluous. There is no settling for dying alone for women. That is projection from your own scared mind.

  • Carrie

    Oh, I am very intrigued by man-bashing! Can you please point where tomato’s post contained any? As in literally ANY man-bashing? Did she remove it already? Because her post is currently bereft of any such promised bashing of men.

    Well, since it’s gone now, can you remember what she had said that prompted you to sign into Disqus, think up a witless retort, then actually type it out knowing full well that it might actually be read by people who would associate you forever with your witless retort?

    Thank you in advance for your response providing what tomato has clearly edited out of her post.

  • Carrie

    Hi there, can you please tell me how long you’ve been psychic? I am fascinated by those who possess the skill to read a sentence from a complete stranger online and then divine the person’s life history, personal motivations behind his/her actions, and by whom they were raised. How did ripov’s father exit the picture? Was it death? Was it a bus that hit him while he wasn’t looking, a piano falling out of a tenth story window, a slip on a banana peel? I mean, since you are clearly professing occult powers and you also don’t mind gossiping about others in public forums, I would love to be impressed by your other-worldly psychic powers of divination regarding ripov (since you initiated the reading on him already).

    I am jealous that I am so much more of a pragmatist when clearly someone with your exceedingly rare and unique powers should be the one earning almost seven figures, not me :( But no, you people always say you like to read tea leaves to help others, not to win at the horse track to make yourself rich…

  • Carrie

    I guess only women and intelligent men are able to realize how laughably false that statement is. Too bad this site rarely sees any of those two populations.

  • Carrie

    Wow, rarely does a person tell a joke (like your first sentence) and then feel the need to SPECIFY “what a joke” in the second sentence. I guess the typical readership here needs that reading assistance, eh?

  • Carrie

    Did you not know that male pattern baldness and female hereditary baldness — while both are forms of alopecia — they are on opposite ends of the spectrum for baldness. They are not just separated by gender but by almost any alopecic marker you can come up with.

  • Carrie

    Regarding pauldrake: when all else fails (when you can’t call the woman stupid, unmarriageable, or ugly), accuse her of sluttiness or future sluttiness.

    lonnnnng sigh at the predictability.

  • Carrie

    Oh, come on. That’s almost a guarantee for longtime readers of this site!

  • Carrie

    Perhaps when you are older you will enjoy the bitter art of telling younger generations that they are necessarily more stupid than your own generation.

  • pauldrake

    The sound of crickets. Give some substance with the promise of more and find out how little it means. Every time I think Matt Forney maybe has gone a bit overboard he is proven right. I’ve come to realize how the battle tested and beaten under 40 set has become hard edged, and why the manosphere is so needed. Also why so many of you are headed for parts unknown in the hopes of finding real femininity. Shame on me for again, again, again showing respect and trying to be a gentleman.

  • Aleksandra Nikolaevna

    Hooold your horses, I never bitched about anything. I have nothing to bitch about, I’m 20 and I have already started my own businesses because jobs are also boring. I was merely asking why people focus so much on maths; for example, I like art (studying about it as well as practicing it and experimenting with techniques), philosophy, history and linguistics much better (I currently speak 6 languages). My point was that I find other sciences to be more interesting and flexible and don’t understand the hype about maths. If it is all just job related, there are plenty of well paid jobs that are not math related, nor created just so women have something to do, lol. About the Legislation part I don’t know, I live in Romania and I have no idea about the legislation in other countries (except for the no-alcohol-until-21 thing in Murrica which saddened me deeply upon hearing). Cheers.

  • Aleksandra Nikolaevna

    And if you might be interested in my business domain, I have a webdesign/branding agency and an online clothes shop. None required maths, both bring in quite a lot of money if you build a good working-and-promoting system.

  • MitchellFinnic

    Firstly, let’s keep in mind my original comment; I stated that men should support women in their academic and career endeavors. I disagreed with the author’s position that men shouldn’t encourage women in their intellectual pursuits. That was it. Then you commented, saying that I didn’t deserve my career because I had probably cheated a man out of the position, that I would likely cheat on my husband, and that my husband would then find support from men like yourself.

    Just summarizing. I have not once told you my political alignment.

    For the purposes of this discussion, I am not as concerned with the data pertaining to divorce rates, simply because the percentage that you suggested was that I was 70% likely to cheat on my husband, you never included anything about divorce, so for brevity I will not include that here. I hope you do not find this dismissive of your information gathering; I am just trying to stay on the topic at hand (My likelihood of cheating on my husband, right?)

    In 2007 (You should know that a study done in 1980 is no longer relevant.), a study by RJ Brand, CM Markey, A Mills, SD Hodges found that women were slightly more likely to cheat than men- with some caveats. The article can be found here: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=sex+differences+in+self-reported+infidelity+and+its+correlates&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ei=NKRFVPL5Fo67ggTX1YCYBg&ved=0CB0QgQMwAA

    In case you don’t want to read the study, here is a summary: “While approximately equal numbers of men and women in our study appear to be cheating, typically, men who were unfaithful cheated many times, consistent with a strategy to
    “spread their seed.” Those women who were unfaithful, however, tended to cheat only a few times, which is more consistent with the possibility that they are cheating in order to try out or trade up to new partners. This relatively low number of cheating episodes in women emerged despite the fact that our measurement of cheating episodes may have inflated estimates of female cheating relative to previous studies (see Blow and Hartnett 2005).”

    Their measurements changed because the definition of “cheating” varies across studies and this study does not define cheating exclusively as sexual intercourse. The authors themselves state, “The specific definitions of cheating used in this research and the inclusion of non-intercourse behaviors as cheating behaviors may at least partially account for the finding that women were likely to report infidelity.”

    And as for your guess that I was 70% likely to cheat on my husband- “Consistent with our hypothesis, we did not find men reporting infidelity more than women; in
    fact, we found a trend toward more women (31.4%) reporting infidelity than men (24.0%), Pearson’s chi square=3.08 p=.08.

    31.4% =/= 70%

  • MitchellFinnic

    Yes, the manosphere is just *so* needed. To teach us women our place!

    The manosphere is just the place to go when I notice myself starting to have those dangerous feelings of ambition, and self-worth. God-forbid I ever feel the motivation to learn!

    Hold up, I think I just sprained my eyes from rolling them so hard…

  • ThomasER916

    LOL! Thanks! I needed that.

  • ThomasER916

    The problem is you don’t understand biology, which is why you’re “saddened” – a response brought about by your Operant Conditioning. The body’s ability to handle alcohol is biological and hereditary. Romanians are a single ethnic group that has lived in a single area of the world for over 10,000 years. Since you’re indoctrinated to believe that everyone is magically “equal” you can’t understand what Alcohol does to different peoples. Learn to speak population genetics.

    Cheers.

  • ThomasER916

    There isn’t a single metric to support your bullshit.

    Evolution is the only game you automatically lose by not playing.

  • ThomasER916

    You’re not “jealous”, you’re just an indoctrinated Useful Idiot for Cultural Marxism whose Operant Conditioning has turned them into a moronic attack bitch. Since you’re really, REALLY stupid I’ll pass along obvious information:

    Click on a poster’s name and you’ll have access to all of their previous posts, websites and you’ll be able to track them down on the internet.

    What’s that? Oh you’re an idiot? Yeah, I gathered that. I’m not psychic, I’m just smarter than you.

  • ThomasER916

    You can’t see it because you’re stupid and indoctrinated. So here it is:
    “You seem to think you’re providing insightful and empowering knowledge to an audience of low-testosterone-mid-life-crisis guys…”

    Then there’s a typical moment of female cognitive dissonance:
    “Where did all this hate come from?”

    Classic Marxist Agitprop. Everyone who dares to question the Cult is magically a “hater.” This Marxist bullshit is literally everywhere: racist! bigot! homophobe! nazi!

    You won’t understand any of this. You’re Triggering.

  • Steve Corner

    Aaaaan even more male-bashing. Proving my point yet again. Amazing.

  • Carrie

    “Evolution is the only game you automatically lose by not playing.”

    Putting aside that evolution isn’t a game, I still agree with the sentiment… therefore I am left wondering WHY you refuse to join those of us who have evolved away from your very backward thinking? You’re the one who by your own definition is losing the game because you choose not to evolve. If you change your mind and decide to participate in evolution again, you likely won’t die alone as you sound quite certain that’s your fate (it does not have to be if you don’t want it to be).

  • Carrie

    … BUT WHERE THOUGH??? Is it visible only to you?

    Until you share what your magic glasses are reading, you’re the only one seeing it!

  • Steve Corner

    And even more bashing. Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a drug.

  • Steve Corner

    Pretty much.

  • Carrie

    Listen, if you didn’t have an answer, you could have just broken down and been honest by saying so. You didn’t have to wave all the little fabricated silliness around to make it look as though there was something where there was nothing.

  • Steve Corner

    But I’m pre-law, so laugh away. LOL

  • Carrie

    ”Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a drug”

    And irony is a helluva fun thing to watch as you aren’t comprehending it!

  • Carrie

    Ah, so you’re not psychic. I guess you weren’t smart enough to notice someone was calling you not very smart. D’oh! I’d explain, but explaining to a dumb person how dumb a person is would be stupid. I doubt you’d be able to appreciate the irony.

    Someone who incessantly throws around the word Marxism has fooled himself into thinking he’s not stupid :(

  • ThomasER916

    I did have an answer, and I included the most important problem – the salient barrier (your stupidity and indoctrination).

    Nothing was “fabricated” nor “waved.” You really are stupid. That’s a fact. You’re also indoctrinated. That too is a fact. There was “something” and I quoted it but you’ll never, ever understand it due to the salient barrier.

  • ThomasER916

    “WHY you refuse to join those of us who have evolved away from your very backward thinking?”

    Since you’re stupid and indoctrinated you believe that evolution is a Political Ideology where everyone must agree with your Cult. That’s not evolution dip shit.

  • Carrie

    OK, you’re making it clear that you still don’t understand, which is made all the more ironic by the fact that all you know how to do is call OTHERS stupid. Wow. It’s like trying to tell a christian that the Earth isn’t flat. All the flat-earth christian learned how to do was repeat circular logic {cough} rather than intelligence.

    Good luck to you, insult comedian. You’ll need it.

  • Carrie

    And since you’re stupid and SELF-indoctrinated, you believe that others believe evolution is a Political Ideology where everyone must agree with some Cult.

    And all I want is for you to burn your cult membership card and trade up to a library card.

  • ThomasER916

    “SELF-indoctrinated”

    OMG you’re fucking stupid! LOL!

  • ThomasER916

    “they are on opposite ends of the spectrum for baldness”

    No they’re not. You’re full of shit and you’re trying to posture knowledge you don’t have.

    AR genes, not “spectrum”, not “marker”.

  • Carrie

    And with that, you’ve proven my point while handily disproving your own. Wow.

  • Carrie

    Persistent little gnat, eh? It doesn’t help your case any; you’re still wrong. And no amount of juvenile name-calling and posturing will change that.

    Oh, look, there’s the fly swatter! Guess I can head on out now. I sure hope that little gnat doesn’t recover. Its name-calling abilities were pretty tired.

  • Steve Corner

    and more bashing. Holy crap. LOL!

  • Wittgenstein

    I just read through ripov’s history as well, curious if the information you implied really was obviously evident in his posts. I found a few of his most recent posts discussing his mom taking him on public transportation, but if you look just a little bit further past that, he mentions his parents as single unit. I think you may have jumped to a conclusion and generalized just a wee bit.

  • *yawn*

    Wow, I’m getting second-hand embarrassment for this guy after reading this “article” lmao. For someone who talks a great deal about what is and isn’t a valid profession, it sure doesn’t seem like he has much of one. Because if he did, it would be likely that he’d be out there making an actual contribution to society and not sitting at home writing a blog that only gets read because people share links on Facebook. Seems to me that he’s either struggling with his own sexuality or is just bitter towards women for whatever reason, because for the life of me, I cannot figure out what type of person has time in their day to write something like this.

    Just because someone says “testing has shown that…” does NOT mean whatever is being said is fact. Whatever “facts” that were attempted to be given seemed to be taken out of context, particularly the one about there being more intelligent males than females. And just because someone says they think they’re smarter than most people they know hardly qualifies their statement to be a statistic.

    But I think the best part of all of this is that the same criticisms he writes about here can easily be applied to men. As if men are sitting at home reading classic literature and PVRing documentaries on astrophysics. A lot of them are sitting at home watching porn hub, Sons of Anarchy or playing PS4 – which is absolutely fine. I cannot understand how what someone watches on TV has anything to do with someone’s level of intelligence in school and in life. This isn’t 17th-century Europe. Actually never mind, because even then people were talking about concepts and ideologies more evolved than ones in this article.

  • ripov

    just goes to show how wrong diots like you who claim ‘alpha male’ status really are. your insight is non-existent because you basically live in a delusional bubble. look up this guy ‘war machine’ thats about to go on trial for attempted murder. hes a prime example of your ilk.
    my parents are still together. my father would make a drill sergeant piss himself if it was necessary. i have 3 older brothers that basically had free reign to toughen me up as they saw fit. i also have a sister. i love them all and they love me. i grew up in a rural area and our family lived off the land. i killed my first deer when i was 8 years old. i was all-state in football, basketball, and track in high school and ran track in college. i got my degree in a professional program and now live in the heart of new york city. if anyone could lay claim to ‘alpha male’ status, i certainly could on many levels, though i never would so as not to be associated with fucktards like you.
    men like you and matt forney think that aaaall of society is against you. you get off on being some kind of man alone against the world. well youre right about that. youre just on the wrong side of argument and the wrong side of history. you call me a white knight when in reality its you who wants to be the white knight. you want to put women in their place. you need them to need you, to need your superior skills to protect them. you assholes should be labeled ‘white knights’, white knight wannabe’s more like, who just cry about your unjust loss of superiority in society.
    well i know no amount of debate can change the thinking of delusional idiots like you. i can only take solace in the fact that you and your ilk are dying off and soon will bother the world no more. good riddance i say.

  • ripov

    good job idiot. you really nailed me. typical of your type. all assumptions, zero facts. must be nice in your delusional bubble.

  • ripov

    youre wasting your time with this dimwit. they can never be convinced of their own idiocy. thankfully, theyll die off soon, if not soon enough.

  • ripov

    you are correct. he is WAY off. we’ll just call him captain insight.

  • ripov

    omg. this explains a lot. come back in 10 years and we can have this discussion again, boy.

  • ripov

    this kid is out of his league.

  • ripov

    you really have your head up your ass, dont you? youre indoctrinated by your own outdated, anti-progressive, misogynistic bullshit. you keep fighting equality there buddy. lets see how that works out for you in the future. have fun being (properly) labeled as asshole.

  • ripov

    nice try fake ‘woman’.

  • ThomasER916

    anti-progressive
    misogynistic
    equality
    outdated

    You’re speaking entirely in buzzwords and slogans. Your brain was replaced by a wad of bumper-stickers. You’re a dickless, Liberal, tranny faggot with a rectal prolapse.

    You just Triggered.

  • ThomasER916

    “you call me a white knight when in reality its you who wants to be the white knight.”

    OMG you’re fucking stupid! You think that works? Do you really believe that simply saying, “No you are!” still works after childhood. You’re a serious faggot for Political Correctness.

  • ripov

    those arent buzzwords for anything, idiot. theyre just words that have actual meanings that pertain to the subject being discussed. funny coming from someone who constantly types ‘Triggered’ as if its used in common speech by anyone.
    are you a teenager? because otherwise, you are a sad, sad person (i wont say man because youre obviously not one).
    seek help before you snap and start beating women who wont fit into the little mold you made for them for their own good, of course, since they cant take care of themselves and all.
    what. a. dipshit.

  • ripov

    yep. you confirmed it. bye teenager. come back when you grow up.

  • ThomasER916

    Mangina mode is Triggered

  • ripov

    come back when you grow up little boy. nice cartoon though.

  • ripov

    jesus, the idiocy going on here. ironic that you call people who think women should be treated as equals white knights when youre the ones wanting to make them out to be in need of men to save and protect them. morons

  • pauldrake

    That 70% remark really frosted you. You shouldn’t be so emotional, nor should you give a shit one way or another if it turns out right or not. You’re a strong independent woman, right? I’ll never know if it happens or not but studies aside believe me it happens. Does it ever in today’s hypergamy world. While you’re at it find and take some of those 8th grade tests from the early 20th Century. Anyone who’s willing to be honest knows our educational standards have taken a nosedive over the generations. That our popular culture is in the trash barrel. You can even meet and talk to some millennials who know they have been badly shortchanged.

  • ThomasER916

    Oh internet maidens! How shall you save thee!

    P.S. Your rectal prolapse is showing.

  • ThomasER916

    Yep. You confirmed it. Bye faggot for Political Correctness. Come back when you’re done sucking dicks and saving whales.

  • ThomasER916

    Jesus, you’re fucking stupid. You’re so fucking stupid you actually believe that an ideology that has a single gender in its name and promotes a single gender magically means “equality”. You’re short-bus retard who’s so stupid you’re BEING a White Knight.

    Don’t worry faggot. Your rectal prolapse is a vagina that your internet fag hags respect.

  • ThomasER916

    Nothing changes the fact that you’re completely and utterly full of shit. You have a typical median female IQ and typical female narcissism. You think you understand science, real science. You don’t. You’ve never held a highly technical position in your entire life and never will. There are smart women and you’re not one of them. You’re just another dip shit Feminist who blathers bullshit while posturing. You really are stupid. That’s a fact.

    AR Genes

    Say it again.

    AR Genes

    One more time because you’re stupid.

    AR Genes

  • ripov

    yeah ok kid. well i hope your mom burns your dinner tonight. im sure youll yell at her for not knowing her place, but i cant say i feel bad for her since im sure she played a large role in your turning out to be such an asshole. also, you might want to cut down on the porn. youve referenced anal prolapse a few too many times. youre gonna go blind if you keep it up.
    good luck ever finding a woman that isnt brain dead. im sure thats just how you like them (or think you do since youre still a virgin) which works in your favor since no woman with any sense will ever give you the time of day. maybe you can go with matt forney to the philippines where its still ok to view women as subservient and find someone, though im guessing he has to pay for it. maybe youll eventually get lucky if you can fool someone into thinking youre a decent human being. (nah, better bring some extra cash.) otherwise, youve got a very rough path ahead of you.
    well as much as i enjoy bandying insults with an adolescent…wait, no i dont. fuck off kid. you need a good therapist. im not getting paid to interact with you and god knows any head shrinker that has to treat you should be paid handsomely. now ill just go back to saving whales and sucking dicks since a pc faggot is the absolute worst thing you seem to be able to come up with in that pea brain of yours.

  • ripov

    god, dont help him! we dont want him to reproduce! so funny though. evolution is exactly what will kill off him and his ilk. (lets just keep that a secret though, ok?)

  • ThomasER916

    No caps? Check!

    Word salad? Check!

    Bullshit posturing? Check!

    Politically Correct White Knight shame sermon? Check!

  • ripov

    hes (very obviously) a kid.

  • ThomasER916

    Oh GAWD you’re such a White Knight faggot! You’re so fucking stupid you can’t figure out that I’ve already played the game.

  • ThomasER916

    You’re obviously a White Knight.

  • ThomasER916

    Wow. Just wow.™

  • Carrie

    You’re incorrect on every count. EVERY count. But that can’t exist in your egomaniacal existence, so why bother with delusional annoyances like you anymore? (Psst, that’s a rhetorical question, not one for which I am demanding an answer.) Feel free to continue making up your own facts about people, and please do let your gargantuan, over-fed ego continue to let you believe those delusions. Perhaps it is the only joy you will ever know in life. I’ll just enjoy the show from the sidelines from now on.

    Gnat, be gone.

  • Carrie

    Yes, I wonder at which age the obsessive need to right-fight and name-call will dissipate? My husband said he used to be like this too, but then a girl showed interest in him in the 9th grade and he shaped right the hell up and stopped acting like that for good.

  • Carrie

    ;) Will do!

  • ripov

    yeah. i was like that too. it took a little longer than the 9th grade to overcome, though.
    a lot of men (boys) turn out this way because theyve been rejected by women (girls), many times their own mothers, and felt powerless, so they rebel against those painful emotions and try to get that feeling of power back by demeaning those who made them feel powerless, namely women.
    sadly, some of them turn into elliot rodger’s or jonathan koppenhaver’s. some just write blogs like matt forney so they can recruit others and not feel so alone. they get so deep into this delusional ideology of male superiority that they never recover and lead very sad, lonely, angry lives where everything and everyone in the world is wrong and against them. they have no empathy or compassion for anyone different from them. they explain away the obvious immorality of their ideas as nature or biology or evolution, its sad and rather pathetic.
    needless to say, most of these dudes become abusive in relationships, but there are lots of delusional women who are easily manipulated by them. their ideas about women are constantly reinforced by the only women who will associate with them, idiots.

  • MitchellFinnic

    Let’s set this straight, just because you happen to be a male and they happen to be bashing you, does not mean it qualifies as “male-bashing.” Got it? They aren’t bashing all males, only you. Understand now?

  • MitchellFinnic

    Like I said, I don’t really get upset by anything on the internet, but when you present a completely imaginary figure, I’m going to call you on your bullshit. You were wrong, and you bet your sweet aunt sally that I’m going to find correct figures and accurate sources to discredit you.

    Apart from all that, let’s review again- I in no way antagonized you and you replied to my comment with personal insults and erroneous claims.

    My only point by making my original post was that men and women should support each other and that my life is my own personal contribution to the MOUNTAIN of evidence that supports my stance. Do you disagree? Do you think that men and women shouldn’t support each other? Do you think that men shouldn’t encourage women?

  • pauldrake

    I gave you me opinion based on my observations and my three decade or so head start on you in life. Let’s say for the sake of argument that both you and your positions are superior to mine. You’re still proving Matt Forney and others right by the emotional defensive tone of your responses. As for as mutual “support” goes screw that. In the PC New World Order under which you and your generation have been educated we men are getting massacred literally and figuratively. We’re the ones that need the support now. When the whole shebang collapses and the barbarians are not at the gate but having crashed through there will be much weeping,wailing, and crying out for the patriarchy which has been destroyed. You say I insult you. No I don’t. I grew up in the midwest when directness and honesty were the hallmarks of communication. I have pointed you in various directions that you have chosen to ignore. That should insult me. Real intellectual curiosity is at a premium sad to say among your generation. Because I have and continue to show you much respect that you interpret as insulting I will advise you to study a little history. All great societies are born, flourish with daring, achieve great things in science, politics and the arts and then decline. We are deeply in the decline phase. I will probably be gone and you will probably be here when the worst comes to pass. Read Hellstorm by Thomas Goodrich. I in no way support the Nazis or any other form of dictatorship but this book reveals in brutal detail what happens to the women in conquered nations. I was about to give more examples but you pretty much ignore my side, promote yours and take it all as an insult. You know what? In spite of it all I like you. Before you get all huffy and report me to the Internet Thought Police I’m saying it in a cyber kind of way. I think, no I know I have shown you my version of Christian love. Seriously, even if you are a Mensa ++ learn not to get mad and insulted when someone says something you don’t like.

  • Denise

    I don’t know, I think there are all different kinds of intelligence really? so maybe you are smarter than me about some things but there are things that I am smarter about than you too

  • Pingback: 5 Gründe, Warum Frauen Mit Tattoos Und Piercings Pleite Sind

  • Steve Corner

    Aaaand even more. Holy shit, I lost count of all the bashing in here. LOL

  • Steve Corner

    10 years? Yeah…right.

  • Dave Kinard

    I don’t know. He seems pretty good at directing traffic to his site.

  • Dave Kinard

    I went to Turd World once. Good Ice cream. Not the best smelling place though.

  • Dave Kinard

    My anal fissure is a girl?

  • Dave Kinard

    You wouldn’t like her, she’s one of those faux-intellectual types.

  • Dave Kinard

    The Beta faggot is the second highest ranked faggot in the faggot pack, and challenges the Alpha faggot for leadership when the opportunity arises.

  • Dave Kinard

    Is this your first day on the internet?

  • Dave Kinard

    To be fair, most people are full of shit. Even after you’ve had a bowel movement, there’s still quite a bit remaining inside of you.

  • Dave Kinard

    Stupid like a fox!

  • Dave Kinard

    Back in my day, we didn’t need no fancy manosphere or mra’s to oppress women. We’d walk fifteen miles from the mines in the snow, barefoot, and say, woman, make me a sandwich then give me a blowjob!

  • Dave Kinard

    Apparently I’m smart enough to contribute to the downfall of your civilization.

  • Dave Kinard

    Wait, if we came from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?

  • Dave Kinard

    That’s mad racist bro.

  • pauldrake

    Good bye and good luck. Seriously I want you and yours to be safe and have great lives. If that is insult then the gulf is way too large to ever be bridged.

  • IdiotsChild

    And then never be heard from again, Dad…

  • IdiotsChild

    Possible answer: because someone still has to write MRA blogs?