Matt Forney
Spread the Word!

Is Feminist Blogger Cynthia Gockley a Dangerous Stalker?


Cynthia Gockley is a feminist and community college instructor from Seattle who blogs under the pseudonym “Cinzia La Strega” (or simply “La Strega”). Since beginning her blog in early 2013, Gockley has engaged in a campaign of harassment against myself and other bloggers in the “manosphere,” stalking us across the Internet, trying to ruin our livelihoods, and libeling us with completely baseless conjecture about our personal lives.

While I have done my best to ignore Gockley, her obsession with me and other manospherians has grown over the past few months. Given her habit of stalking her “enemies” and digging up information on them, their spouses and family members (who are private figures), I believe I have a duty to inform people about how dangerous this woman is.


Cynthia Gockley: Portrait of a Barren Feminist

According to her own words and her Facebook profile, Cynthia Gockley is 58 years old and lives in the Seattle, Washington area. The White Pages lists her address and phone number in Mountlake Terrace, a suburb just to the north of King County; I can’t confirm this, but her IP address places her as being in nearby Everett, so it’s plausible. She currently works as a part-time ESL instructor at Edmonds Community College, though in the past she has also been employed as a massage therapist and as a community services advisor at a funeral home, even writing a blog about her experiences with the latter. She lists the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Louisiana State University and the Seattle Massage School as her alma maters.

Under her “Cinzia La Strega” identity, Gockley has spilled an enormous amount of information about her personal life. She is unmarried and has no children, has been morbidly obese her whole life (at one point weighing more than 300 pounds), and is currently in a relationship with a 65-year old transsexual “woman.” She doesn’t make much money, describing herself as being “overworked,” “underpaid” and in the “basement” of American academia. During her youth, she extensively traveled the world, even teaching in Iran at one point. She is loud and proud about her sexual exploits, referring to herself as an “elderslut,” and at one point was even addicted to soliciting casual sex with men off Craigslist:

However, a few years ago, I had a very different blog.  It was a kind of confessional, recounting with humor and some salacious detail a year spent pursuing casual encounters on craigslist.  (Frankly, I was more than a little inspired by A Round Heeled Woman by Jane Juska.)  Well, as you know, Sex Sells, even sexual escapades as weird and pathetic as I was often describing in my crazy little blog.

Not only that, Gockley’s uncle repeatedly attempted to molest her when she was young, slandering her to her family members when she understandably rebuffed his advances:

Later, I met my uncle at the pool, where he coolly appraised my swimsuit-clad body. “You’re one of those fat women who actually looks better without her clothes on,” he opined. I dived into the water to escape my embarrassment. Later, he came over to the pool where I was idly dangling my legs. He sat down beside me, laid a ham-sized hand on my knee, and invited me to give him a massage before dinner. As he insinuated his hand between my thighs, it was clear that “massage” was code for something more intimate.

Despite this, Gockley seems more offended by her uncle’s sexism then by his attempts to rape her, as shown by how she titled the post “MGTOW, or My Uncle, the Misogynist” instead of, say, “My Uncle, the Alleged Incestual Rapist.”

Gockley seems to have (or has had) poor relationships with most of her family members in general. She has been haunted by nightmares of her deceased mother for the past few years, with whom she failed to “connect” with while she was alive, and she thinks so little of her sisters that she chose to will her estate to her “girl”friend’s children instead:

After C. and I took up, I came up with an idea to leave it in a charitable trust to be administered by her children and grandchildren. When the idea hit me, I became very excited. Not only would I leave my assets to charitable causes, a group of tightly knit siblings would have the opportunity to practice philanthropy. It would give them a reason to gather together annually (at least for a decade or so) to share their values and concerns.  It would surely improve their characters while benefiting others.  And finally, it would provide someone a reason to remember me, hopefully in a positive fashion.  It just seemed like a winning idea in every respect, and the more I mulled it over, the better I felt about this rather unusual plan.

Gockley’s life experiences have left her emotionally fragile and prone to sudden breakdowns, realities which she tries to hide by adopting a false pose of toughness. Occasionally, however, the mask slips, as it does in this post where she freaked out merely at me posting a still from the movie Irreversible on my blog. It would not be unfair to suggest that Gockley suffers from a mental illness, as her behavior consistently displays symptoms of narcissistic and histrionic personality disorder.

While none of this is a crime, instead of seeking professional help, Gockley has chosen a destructive path. Unwilling or unable to deal with her personal demons, she inflicts her inner torment on the rest of society at large.

From Critique to Stalking

Cynthia Gockley began blogging in January of 2013 under the pen name “Cinzia La Strega,” titling her blog Roosh & Me: An Old Feminist Looks at the New Misogynist, which is still reflected in the blog’s URL (she recently retitled it The Blog of Cinzia La Strega). At the same time, she became a frequent commenter at Manboobz, an anti-anti-feminist blog run by freelance writer David Futrelle, a known liar and fraud who uses smear tactics to denounce those he considers “misogynistic.” Futrelle reads Gockley’s blog and has cited it as a source for his own articles in the past.

Befitting the blog’s title, Gockley’s initial articles were focused on my friend and colleague Roosh, a noted anti-feminist and “game” writer. Of the 19 articles she wrote in the first three months, 13 of them were about Roosh in some form or another. Gockley’s very first posts featured pictures of manospherians’ family members that she stole from their Facebook profiles, beginning a pattern of stalking that has only intensified in recent months. She has a disturbing love/hate relationship with Roosh, as shown by this creepy post she wrote after he replied to one of her YouTube comments.

Gockley began blogging about me in February, alternately spreading falsehoods about me (including claiming that I was 40 years old) and attempting to comment on my blog. While I originally was content to let her vent, I banned Gockley from commenting in June after discovering that while she was polite to me on my blog, she was leaving fake one-star reviews of my books on Amazon in an attempt to hurt me financially. She has done this to Roosh as well; see here and here. Despite her overt attempts to sabotage us, Gockley exhibits nauseating hypocrisy on this issue, as shown by how she wrote a blog post complaining about an “MRA” who left a fake negative review of feminist Michael Kimmel’s book Angry White Men.

While Gockley’s obsession with Roosh has waned somewhat in recent months, her harassment of me has become worse; a great many of the over 150 articles she has posted on her blog reference me in some form. Gockley combs my Twitter page multiple times a day for blogging material and follows me around the Internet, replying to every comment I make on every website she can find; see here and here for examples (the comment that was “deleted by Amazon” was hers, removed for violating the site’s rules). Despite attacking me on a nearly daily basis, stalking me online and attempting to cause me financial harm, Gockley recently had the gall to email me asking for a review copy of my book Writing for Peanuts (screenshot here):


Cinzia La Strega


Writing for Peanuts Review

Matt, I would be privileged to review your newest e-book on my blog.

Akismet Spam Check: passed
Sent from (ip address):
Date/Time: December 20, 2013 10:09 pm
Coming from (referer):
Using (user agent): Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:26.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0

It gets worse. In addition to harassing Roosh, myself and other bloggers, Gockley has targeted our friends and family members, who are not public figures and thus off-limits. As I mentioned above, Gockley has stalked and stolen private pictures of manospherians’ family members to post on her blog, and she has also gone after the wife of my friend and Spearhead publisher W.F. Price, digging up advertisements his wife posts looking for work and falsely claiming that Price is a “car salesman” (screenshot here). She also once tracked down one of my high school classmates solely so she could write a post about my teenage years.

While she spends hours rooting through the personal information of people who have done nothing to her, Gockley is zealously protective of her own online pseudonymity. Even as she steals personal photos from Roosh, myself and our family members and attempts to uncover every detail of our private lives, she refuses to attach her name to her blog because she is “just a teensy bit paranoid of nut jobs (like the partially hinged, moronic commentators of Roosh’s blogs) showing up at my doorstep or workplace unannounced, AK-7s in hand.” It’s only recently that she dared to post a picture of herself on her blog’s Google+ profile.

And in yet another example of her hypocrisy, while Gockley lives in paranoid fear of one of my readers coming to murder her, she has no problem with making violent threats against her enemies, such as in this comment at Manboobz:

Woo, this is close to home. I’m not trans, but my partner is. I’d like to hear one of these ass hats say this stuff out loud in my presence: they would feel the full weight of my righteous fury (all 200+ # of it behind one arthritic fist). Seriously, bring it on!!! (I’m not really a violent person but in this case I would make an exception.).

Also of note in that comment is Gockley’s confession that she stole and destroyed a book from her public library solely because she didn’t agree with its contents:

And speaking of Bailey and his horrible, rightfully discredited “science,” I will make a confession: I actually “lost” my public library’s copy. I know, I know that’s BAD, but I couldn’t bear the thought of some unwitting young trans person (or spouse of a trans person) checking it out in good faith and then wasting months if not years worrying about “autogynophelia” as though it really were A Thing.

This is both immoral and illegal, though as her stalking shows, neither morality nor the law concern Gockley that much.

Finally, Gockley’s constant threats to quit blogging and her inability to actually stop are indicative of a serious underlying pathology. She has declared that she will quit blogging about Roosh, myself and the “manosphere” no less than three times in the past year—most recently in December—but has come back every time. This is all the more disturbing when you consider that she derives no joy from obsessing over our writings, describing herself as an “anger addict” and saying that we put her in “a state of chronic, obsessive rage.” Gockley’s “girl”friend has repeatedly attempted to stop her, claiming that her blogging is “contributing to [her] depression and increasingly bleak perspective,” but has had no success thus far.


It would be a fair guess to say that Cynthia Gockley’s obsession with myself and the manosphere is motivated in part by her own personal failings. She is overweight and in poor health, childless, unmarried, has a history of being sexually abused, is estranged from her family, and is employed at an embarrassingly low level for her age. And as it turns out, Gockley herself confirmed this in a comment at the Bodycrimes blog (screenshot here):

So many good points here. Part of the reason I stopped blogging about the manosphere is because I couldn’t manage to maintain a healthy perspective on it. Everything I read seemed like a direct, personal attack, and slid right under my skin and stabbed me in my vitals. I guess I’ve lived long enough to have accumulated wounds that are easily re-opened. That’s why I love blogs like yours; you (and some of your commentators) make me laugh; it’s very empowering. I can only peer into the abyss while clutching the hands of others.

It’s worth noting that Gockley wrote this comment two days before she resumed regular blogging, after declaring that she was quitting for the third time the month before. In another comment at Bodycrimes, she admitted her inability to stop herself (screenshot here):

My SO thinks this obsession is very unhealthy for me, and advised me repeatedly to cease. She doesn’t want to read my blog or talk about it at all, ever. I promised to quit but of course I immediately fell off the wagon. Seriously, I think of this as an addiction, like smoking.

While I sympathize with Cynthia Gockley and her struggles with mental illness, her libel of me, Roosh and our associates is unjustified and indefensible. Her claims that Roosh and myself are “sociopaths” is stunning considering her narcissistic and histrionic online antics.

Through her writings and actions, Cynthia Gockley has proven herself to be an unstable, dangerous individual and is possibly on the verge of a meltdown. For your own safety, you should not employ Gockley or interact with her in any way. I have no ill will against Gockley and wish her the best in coming to grips with her psychological issues.

For further reading:

UPDATE: Barely three hours after this post’s publication, the proprietor of the Bodycrimes blog has made her site private. I have added screenshots of Gockley’s comments there to this post.

UPDATE II: Gockley has responded on her blog. She has not denied a single thing I’ve written about her, but instead is complaining that I’m “intoleran[t] to criticism” and that her life has been “published without her permission on the Internet.” (But when she was swiping the personal photos of manosphere bloggers’ family members and hounding their wives, that was apparently kosher.) Gockley is also threatening to explore her “legal options,” which is hilarious considering that she was the one who put all this information online, and reposting publicly available information is not illegal.

UPDATE III: On February 13th, four days after this article was published, Cynthia Gockley took her “Cinzia La Strega” blog offline. I have made screenshots of every article of hers linked in this post and will be uploading them as time permits. For the record, Gockley has yet to deny the factual veracity of anything written in this post. I still have no ill will against her and I sincerely hope she gets the psychological help that she needs.

Read Next: Lindy West and the End of the Feminist Nomenklatura

  • Sounds like a crazy bitch. Why don’t I ever get quality stalkers like that? All I get is faggots like Ryu trying to get me to be more extreme about white nationalism.

  • Take solace in the fact that she will soon be relegated to the shambling pensioner’s lines, unable to bother anyone with her obnoxious ideas.

  • Mina

    Typical brain damaged Liberal what else is old???

  • Dr. Illusion: We shouldn’t call her names like “crazy bitch.” As much as she has tried to hurt us, she is a sick woman who doesn’t realize what she is doing. She deserves our pity, not our scorn.

  • That’s pathetic. You’re doing gods work forney. Thank for driving home just how low these types are.

  • And ZING! Barely three hours after I posted this article, Bodycrimes, one of the blogs where Gockley commented and stalked manospherians, has been taken off-line. Unfortunately, I screencapped her comments there. You can’t run and you can’t hide.

    I also have the real name and location of the Bodycrimes blog owner, but I will keep it out of the public record. Gockley is the issue here; Futrelle and Bodycrimes were just her enablers.

  • Wow.

    If she were focused on me, I might be worried she would try and show up at my house, or something. Well, if I thought she could find me and get across a continent. (I would worry she’d show up at the Day Job, but seeing as how there are armed guards outside it…)

    Hope you guys are ready to defend yourselves. If there’s one sick person showing her illness, there’s bound to be more off the rails lunatics.

  • j

    This could be a portrait of every radical feminist (or leftist of any sort, really). They’re broken, evolutionary dead ends, obese and ugly and aged into obsolescence, so they perceive all of nature as a “direct, personal attack.” And they’re right. Feminism (and all leftism) is what happens when technology allows the outcasts, rejects, and ugly runts of the litter to survive and rail against the cruelty of nature.

  • Theodore Logan

    I think this Cynthia Gockley is a great example of what a real feminist looks like. Feminism is unearned privilege for fat, ugly, fat and ugly bitches. Western society cannot collapse soon enough.

  • Matt, is that you? Not call her a crazy bitch? She’s just misunderstood? The junkie is drug victim, never a perp? The thug is economically disadvantaged?

    I realize in a female-centric society we must use female finesse to dodge institutional retaliation, but this is a red-pill blog.

    If Cynthia Gockley, whom you suggest is mentally ill based on her consistent behavior, in not a crazy bitch, then who is? Do you suggest we retire the terminology as unrealistic or perhaps too hurtful?

    This flexibility struck me as well: “For your own safety, you should not employ Gockley or interact with her in any way. I have no ill will against Gockley…”

    I admire the emotional independence and not adding to pain for petty indulgence of the emotions, but it is ill will in societal terms to discriminate in our relationships. And that discrimination and even hurtfulness is a good thing! It’s like we men are afraid to even define the problem that taking care of our business would solve. I’ve read BO’s bible, Rules for Radicals, and I know that to effect political change, you’ve got to be candid to the world and change the culture.

    The bitch described in this post, she be crazy. I don’t know how an account of female brokenness could be more acute. A swath of ruin trails behind feminism, so we can hardly be surprised at another case of female maladaption, especially knowing that women never foster societal relationships in the first place. That is why in society women are put in their place by men, or women undermine society at large.

    If we are more concerned with emotional value and winning at emotional rewards, debating the merit of collective win-win vs. relative win-lose, we cease to think like men who make society possible. Coddling the forces of societal destruction and the destruction of our potentials is unacceptable.

    First, we need to be rational. Crazy bitch = destructive, broken woman to be quarantined so that others might live well and enjoy success. Are we afraid to fathom the responsibility of male popular sovereignty? I am more afraid of not having power over myself. Turns out that if you don’t have power over non-cooperative others, you don’t have power over yourself. Life is a competitive race condition. Life is change per the laws of evolution.

    Manhood Recovery Program
    Step One: Get the vocabulary right and call a spade a spade. That is the essence of red pill. We should not turn away from where objective analysis leads. Neither should be lose sight of rational ideas for the sake of polishing vocabulary without functional improvement in communication. A broken old women lashing out in pain against intellectually honest thinkers because she in hopelessly vested in the illusion that is The Narrative with any personal narrative instilled from hurtful childhood influences that broke her into the wife of the illusion she desperately want to make whole and true just doesn’t work as well in summary as crazy bitch. We don’t need to wallow in her details. We need to extricate ourselves from those details. That is our red-pill mission because our potential is superior and good, unlike most people in the world.

  • I have no problem crushing hateful feminists, but this woman is mentally ill. I genuinely wish her the best.

  • Doug, Theodore: I get where you’re coming from, but we have to be the bigger people here. Getting angry and calling Gockley and women like her names will just engender sympathy for them and force us on the defensive. In this specific case, I’m not trying to preach to the choir, but inform people who aren’t necessarily aligned with red pill beliefs that our enemies are psychotic and ill.

    More to the point, calling Gockley names gives her power. She is, by any objective standard, a complete failure as a human being. She acts out her frustration by stalking manospherians because she has no power in her real life. By ripping the mask away and revealing the tragedy that is her life, I have stripped her of what little power she’s accumulated.

    No insults we hurl at her could possibly make her life even worse than it is already.

  • ray

    she knows exactly what she does, and glories in her own evil

    you think you’re her only victim, boyo? she has left a trail of damage and destruction in her gleeful wake

    …oh but wait, woops, she was ABUSED… yeah i forgot, everybody did her wrong, she’s actually a VICTIM!


    so stoopid me — Open Season on Males is OK!

    soft-selling willful and persistent malevolence as “mental illness” on the part of someone who “doesn’t know what she’s doing” is simultaneously untruthful, and contributive of the tactics and methods that allow the matriarchy — and it’s more virulent advocates — to continue in power across the western world

  • Jeremy

    Her writing reminds me of some of the people who have trolled/commented at Rollo’s. I would not be surprised if LivingTree turned out to be this woman.

  • *Standing ovation*

    This post now comes up #4 in a search for her name.

    The sad thing is I bet she is above-average looking compared to the other posters on manboobz.

  • Matt, I respect the logic of what you are doing, now that you clarified it for me. I think it comes down whether or not Americans or Westerners at large can be salvaged. They cannot be. We have a balloon payment before us, and a great opportunity to free those of human nature from those of subhuman nature. And have no doubt that the social engineering via government infiltration has not bred for that. The fiat money is too big to be bested in a PR (read propaganda) battle. Obama is flat out lying now, and it does not matter. The sheeple are all in, and have nothing without the virtue of The Narrative. We are subject to an evolutionarily stable state by homoeostasis the requires decline. The powers that be are forcing a win-lose corruption that has net negative value. Only self-destruction of the system will stop it, and it must. The only question is what comes next. I wish you would reconsider. This fight is part of a big picture and the long haul of history and evolution. The right way is a fresh start. We have started fresh with our value system, still being hashed out by peer review, hence this dialog. You cannot beat the system. You cannot redeem garbage. We need fully human people who intrinsically want civilized patriarchy. We can’t afford to take the lesser evil, to take on the masses and dumb down the message. We are either going to found the next record great culture and civilization or we have failed to release our potential. The evolutionary die is cast as far as the nature of the conflict. Strategically, we should use female-centric methods of exploitation with outsiders and be red-pill masculine with our brothers in patriarchy in private or at least minimal fanfare. (Some fanfare is required to blog and communicate on the Internet.) But cater to those who are inferior or at least antithetically alien? We ought to cater to our potential and simply choose the best strategy. Every president of the US will be worse and worse because hearts are hardened. You cannot reason with women, and you can’t influence better than those with money sovereignty called seignoriage. They have limitless resources because they have a legal and superlatively violent claim on your resources and mine. Now is the time to deal in the riches of ideas, not to water them down for the masses. Tyrants are a dime a dozen when sheeple area dime a dozen. That is the problem, but the problem is eventually self-rectifying. We only need to position ourselves to pick up the pieces. It would be nice to simply fix the system. You can’t fix stupid. You eliminate it, or sit back and let it eliminate itself. Theodore and I think the only fix is the problem running its course. You must believe the system with this people is salvageable. Even if people could be properly ‘reeducated’, the resources are just not available. The laws of this conflict are evolution. I will not buy a woman a drink again, and I mean that as a metaphor for not supporting the sheeple vested in the illusory virtue they don’t really have. They are cowardly vultures. I recommend adopting their methods until we have the luxury of all-or-nothing interactions with people by whether or not they have the prerequisite basics of being civilized (or of civilized utility in the case of women). Only when we have popular sovereignty can we make the civilization worthy of our heritage and patrimony. For now we can muster our values and ourselves. Everyone else is, which is why Western civilization is rotten to the core. It believe it is foolish to try and fix the entire group. Gaining a PR advantage? It helps to spread the message to those who are able to unplug with some prompting, but you play a dangerous game of bastardizing the message. People who need the medicine in adulterated form can never be allies. As for the loyalty of women, we need not try and convince women. They either have influential fathers and husbands of quality, or they are water under the bridge of feminism. Lack of our diversity to some extent is our strength. We can’t compete on volume, only potency. And that’s the beaten dead horse. We all must do what we think is best. I plant ideas and hope they survive to sprout in the vacuum to come, probably after I’m long gone. C’est la vie. I no longer attempt to alter the course of life. I try to get life to take me on its course and opportunely pick the best position on board I can manage. No more paying for drinks for nothing.

  • This is a great post — really entertaining to watch these psychopath feminists have their shit exposed, dissected, and carefully documented, for posterity. Keep up the great work!

  • wolfgang

    Wow, this is the most thorough and devastating take-downs I’ve ever read online. It really is sad, she needs to get help. She certainly needs to get offline, it’s not healthy for her or the people she lashes out at in her sickness.

  • Thanks for writing about Ms. Gockley. I, too, have been written about by this woman on her Roosh&Me site, and in her post she made bizarre and not-factual personal comments about me. I will link to your post in my next weekly link up to warn other bloggers to be careful.

    Those of us who are Christians should pray for Ms. Gockley. I do not wish her ill and I hope she will find peace and healing through Our Lord.

  • Re: Bodycrimes

    I am not part of the manosphere, but nevertheless, she has written about me extensively and rather obsessively, though she has not gone out of her way to publish personal information. However, some feminist sites have done very sordid thing; FJ illegal obtained and published pictures of my five children, for instance. Bodycrimes and Mr. Futrelle have never stooped so low as that.

    It’s odd, this obsession that anti-feminist bloggers inspire, isn’t it? Why are they so obsessed with us?

  • ray

    Christians know wickedness is not a mental illness, but a behaviour chosen to defy God

    those who actually have to extinguish wickednes dont call evil a turnip

    strega means witch, so praying is proper, as King Jeshua said love your enemy, but he also said he will destroy witches, all of them, and not prettily

    that happens largely via his servants, to whom Christians, particularly, should be obedient, rather than joining the heathen in spite and rebellion — Rev, Exodus, Daniel

    its unchristian and unwise not to warn this witch, and the many who imitate, support, fund, defend, legislate for, and empower her

    the Lord forgives, He truly is gentle and lamblike, but i’m not, and for awhile He wont be either, so be ready

  • Bam! Sha-bam! Kaboom!

    Gockley has responded. Notably, she didn’t bother to refute or deny a single thing I wrote about her, instead writing stuff like this:

    My life has always been an open book. Now, it seems, it is an open book published without my permission on the internet.

    But when you were stealing the private photos of manosphere bloggers’ family members and stalking us across the Internet, no, that was perfectly fine.

  • @SSM

    Guilt by association. You may not be part of the manosphere but being their allies is qualification enough.

  • I think it’s hilarious that anyone can claim any right to privacy after using any kind of social networking whatsoever. Humans have an unending capacity for self-deception.

  • Jones

    Thanks for the visual warning, Matt — it’s good to be forewarned against “accidentally” bumping into this kind of person …

  • Taking pictures of people’s kids……Man, that’s creepy. Stalker type of material. Word to the wise, I’d let the cops know about her. Just in case.


  • Damn Matt! I hope that you are watching your back bro! Also i do hope that she does seek some help for her mental issues. We are all pulling for her! :)

  • Sir, you used the word “myself” incorrectly 4+ times in this post. You should be using “me” in each of these cases, e.g. “Gockley has engaged in a campaign of harassment against me.” Thank you.

  • This Cynthia is one sick puppy with some sort of messiah complex. Thinks its her right and duty to cleanse the world of any thought she deems unsuitable. I hope she gets the help she needs before she turns up in your bushes watching you sleep.

  • Days of Broken Arrows

    Calling women things like “crazy bitch” is the equivalent of women responding with “you have mommy issues” or “you have a small penis” when confronted with an argument they don’t agree with. Namecalling just shows you lack a solid argument.

    This post might be a bit lengthy, but it’s definitely full of well-researched arguments and steers clear of immature BS. Any lawyer who gets involved would definitely want to bring this to court, since it’s totally respectable, unlike the rants that inspired it to begin with.

  • baguazhang

    Reminds me of my retarded ESL teacher when I was a kid. What is it with ESL teachers being left wing shitstains?

    Are you sure the one at the funeral home and massage place are the same person? Maybe I can do a little “customer complaint”.

    Feminism is more less synonymous with mental illness to begin with.

    These liberal types are narcissists who spend their entire lives believing they’re superheros fighting oppression because they were never taught the distinction between moral good and objective good.

    Don’t worry, they’re never brave enough to do anything beyond words.

  • Ben

    Link to this wherever and whenever. If there are any SEO guys reading this, please link to this.

  • I notice she’s allowing mocking comments on her blog, just so she can respond to them sarcastically.
    what a loser.

  • Wally


    Many of your links in the article say when I place the cursor over them.

  • Wally: I did that for a reason; to keep Gockley’s site from getting a boost in Google’s pageranking. Considering that she’s stalking manospherians’ family members, I don’t think it’s a good idea to give their private info the exposure.

  • Wally

    One of the donotlink clicks led me to a site called rooshnme dot blogspot. In the comment section there are posts by “Cinzia”.

  • Wally

    Ok, my bad. I had not read your full article yet. I see you reference her roosh and me title. You can delete my two previous comments if necessary.

  • Pingback: Lightning Round – 2014/02/12 | Free Northerner()

  • “She has a disturbing love/hate relationship with Roosh, as shown by this creepy post she wrote after he replied to one of her YouTube comments.”

    You are going to want to look-up the cache for the link in that quote and link to a screenshot. She took down her creepy post.

  • Yesssssss

    Her obsessed hamster cunt blog is private now too.

    Great job, Matt. These evil hambeasts deserve what’s coming. She’ll never rest again after this. Have fun in hell, Cynthia! The world knows who you are!

  • You have to remember, cultural marxists have no sense of “fair play” (except when they are vulnerable) and so of course they don’t view it as a moral requirement to leave innocents out of their little wars.

    In social justice, the ends always justify the means.

  • Pingback: Feminism | A Response to Miri from Brute Reason. | PUMPsix()

  • Will S.

    Bodycrimes is back up, and she’s commenting there, and blogging again.